With the release of this camera, non-full-frame SLR cameras have lost their relevance.
This camera fully justifies its price.
Pros
Bought to replace Nikon D90 SLR camera. So I'll compare it first. Sony is better in absolutely everything.
1) First, size. A mirrorless camera is much smaller for obvious reasons. Despite this, the size of the matrix is the same.
2) Photo quality is significantly better thanks to Sony post-processing and a more advanced sensor, even when using standard lenses. Only starting from ISO 6400, when shooting at dusk, barely noticeable noise begins to appear.
3) Even the last plus of SLR cameras, the optical viewfinder, fades against the background of the Sony digital viewfinder, because in digital you immediately see the colors and the exposure that you get in the end in the finished picture. And thanks to the quality and resolution of the viewfinder screen, you generally forget that it is not optical.
Of the pluses, it is also worth noting:
1) The fastest focusing among all non-full-frame cameras (even SLRs) at the time of purchase
2) Ability to transfer photos in one click to your phone.
3) The ability to control the camera using your phone in LiveView mode.
4) Ability to install additional programs to help photographers. For example, a program for convenient shooting of Time Lapses.
5) Camera design.
Cons
Is it possible that the screen could be made touch, for example, to quickly select the focus point. : now you can look at the a6300.
With its pros:
1. Camera 24 MP
2. Fast focus, high burst speed
3. Photo quality
4. Compact and lightweight (great for every day, while traveling)
Cons:
The battery is rather weak, it is advisable to have spare batteries.