Review on Hankook Ventus V12 evo 2 Summer Radial Tire Review: 255/40R19 93Y by Micha Sawecki ᠌
The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.
About paid money: KontiSportKontakt5 low bow, the tires worked, the car clearly followed the commands, I got out of different situations quite confidently! But still I won’t buy it anymore - wear is fast and more expensive than competitors. Here you have another plus in the Hankook garden, accessibility and practicality. In general, according to Ventus - moderately soft, confidently controlled tires both on dry and wet roads, for adequate money - this cannot but rejoice! By the way, I was pleasantly surprised in the off-season at temperatures of -3 / +5 and almost also perfectly responds to steering and braking efforts (not snow, without fanaticism). By the way, be careful when driving onto an unpaved roadside on the highway! On Ventus, you can’t do this at speed, a skid may begin.
- My car is front-wheel drive, the size of the rollers is 225/45. I compare with ContiSportContact 5 in the same size. I liked the Ventus more) it behaves a little better on an asphalt road. The feeling that you are turning on rails is more pronounced, the rutting is felt less, the rubber is more tenacious. In the wet at first glance, both tires are good! In terms of wear resistance, Ventus is clearly a priority.
- Noisy!. From 80 to 120 there is a rumble in the car. By the way, it seemed that in the first season the noise level was less, and in the spring after changing shoes it is very noisy. Maybe it seemed so after winter less noisy tires. By the way, Conti has less noise, but it also did not differ in a comfortable level. Hankook has almost no sidewall and does not forgive mistakes . Conti can forgive, but only small roughnesses. Ventus and Conti do not like any slush, they skid, we know :) Consumption after Conti increased slightly, my computer shows 0.1-0.2 l / 100km more.
