Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Hemant Hemant ᠌ photo
Delhi
1 Level
131 Review
193 Karma

Review on beyerdynamic DT 880 Premium Edition 250 Ohm Over-Ear Headphones - Wired Semi-Open Design for High-End Stereo Systems by Hemant Hemant ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Performs its functions, nothing unusual.

I put 3 because they are just good headphones, exactly the same as all their other competitors. All of them are half measures. Senhi 600 is just the middle without a stage. Akg 700 is a blockage on the bottoms with a bunch of peaks on the highs. Baer 880 is a blockage on the bottoms and a shelf on the treble. All these headphones are approximately equal in detail, but some create pseudo-details by playing with the frequency response. For example, a shelf at HF ​​at 880 and peaks at akg. - Speaking of details, I recently bought an Austrian audio hi-x65, they have real details, no matter what I do with the frequency response, the feeling of detail never fails. Therefore, I was finally able to equalize the treble so that nothing cuts the ear and at the same time without losing the previously mentioned details.

img 1 attached to beyerdynamic DT 880 Premium Edition 250 Ohm Over-Ear Headphones - Wired Semi-Open Design for High-End Stereo Systems review by Hemant Hemant ᠌
img 2 attached to beyerdynamic DT 880 Premium Edition 250 Ohm Over-Ear Headphones - Wired Semi-Open Design for High-End Stereo Systems review by Hemant Hemant ᠌



Pros
  • Just good headphones, if you like buyers or don't like everyone else, then a good option.
Cons
  • The blockage on the bottoms (sub) (midbass is ok) by ~ 5db, the shelf at the high frequencies by about the same 3-5db, because of which everything sounds sharp, often click and sibilant, actually because of it I can’t listen to them at high volume. Everyone who says that these headphones have more details than competitors either lie or get confused, confuse pseudo-details because of the frequency response. Positioning is good, but this is probably due to the same pseudo-detail (the mouth of the instrument is smaller due to low-frequency blockage and therefore it is easier to localize) The stage is quite large, but there is no depth, it feels like a wall of sound at a fixed distance. And now the most interesting - equalization. If you equalize them evenly, then you will not understand where all the details have disappeared . I have already described the answer to this dilemma above. As a result, I had to leave the highs pulled up, otherwise the 880 does not work out its position at all. Typical analytical headphones. 770 and 990 are the same, but with a sharper sound, so I do not advise you to look at them.