Review on 💻 Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor: 6 Core, Up to 4.6 GHz, LGA 1151 300 Series, 65W Power Consumption by Wiktor ygado ᠌

analysis of 8086k Since I switched from 6800k to it, I'll base my assessment on a comparison. I only work, so there are no "equals" between 6800k and 6850k in terms of rendering speed (in the sense of six nuclear physicists). However, working with graphics on an 8086k is much more comfortable because to the higher performance per core and up to 5 GHz of turbo boost. Since you spend the entire day working and only 20 minutes rendering, the pace of work is what matters the most to me. Surprisingly, I preferred the temperature at 8086k more. For instance, under the stress of Aida, a 6800k WITH PIPOEM at 4.3 warmed up to 82, whereas an 8086k at the same 4.3 (that is, in stock) in the same Aida with its patient thermal paste under the lid gave 72! Carl! Whoever writes that he is in stock there Buy a Noctua D15, and everything will be alright. The mother of the Asrock Z370 Extreme 4 took a light frequency of 5.2 for all cores and 5.0 for the cache, and the percentage is NOT scalped. set the voltage at 1.33 (LLC 1 actually output 1.36). I chose a huge project (often unstable overclocking gives blue on it) instead, worked with it, and then installed the render. I chose not to perform stress because they only fry the percent to no purpose and neither what type of genuine stability in the load they don't reveal. The percent succeeded spectacularly! Oh yes, I achieved 228/1699 on bluebench 15. 8086k at such a frequency is, of course, hot; 83 was the top, while 65 was the average. 35 in idle time. I believe there was opportunity for slowing even if harmful voltages were added to the 5.3. I permanently left 5.0 / 5.0 cores / Cache with Vcore 1.31 as a consequence.