Review on Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM by Quang Qu ᠌

In spite of the conflicting opinions expressed by reviewers, I went ahead and purchased this lens. What I want to point out is that the 24-105 IS LESS TO THEM IN PICTURE QUALITY, and it's not about crooked hands, believe me, he shoots the same way, like a whale 28-80, and sometimes worse, but then a whale costs a penny, when used in conjunction with the Canon 600d and then the Canon 5d Mark II. The 24-105mm lens should not be designated as a "L" lens because it is unqualified for use in professional photography. If you're shooting video, the 28-80 is by far preferable to the 24-105 in terms of quality and aesthetics. The lack of a stabilizer and the relatively wide focal length are both drawbacks, but. And a video shot on Jupiter or any other helios simply tramples on the renowned Japanese glass. Someone will say, "This is a fix and all that;" I agree, it does a better job of communicating what it sees, but pardon me, "PROFESSIONAL GLASS" would be more appropriate than Soviet glass, at least in terms of color, but alas, it is not. Again, you can color the videos in post-production; however, the quality will be lower than that of a fifty dollar or helios stock video. In photography, everything is steady if the lighting is good, and it's very watchable and juicy if the lighting is good, but if it's poor or cloudy, you need to use a flash, just like you would indoors, because even a raised ISO won't save you, and the result of photographing without a flash is, to put it mildly, not very dark he, and the bullied iso adjusts itself. In conclusion, if you have the means to do so and don't mind spending a little extra, go ahead and purchase this lens. Just don't expect any miraculous abilities or improvements in your drawing skills.