Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Marc Sortijas photo
Georgia, Tbilisi
1 Level
738 Review
27 Karma

Review on Men Wallet Minimalist Pocket CSC B by Marc Sortijas

Revainrating 5 out of 5

No more fat bulge under my right bottom!

A back pocket wallet is easy prey if someone aims at you in a crowd. Also, it caused me on a long trip back problems. Since I live in Southern California EVERYTHING is a long drive. Damn, the job takes an hour one way. So I wanted a minimal front pocket wallet. After researching I found that some other (carbon fiber, metal etc.) can start to carry in your pocket. I wanted a quality leather although I knew it would be a tone thicker. I took out my wallet as soon as I got home as it was very inconvenient. That meant there was a time I forgot the ant walked out the door without him.Love this wallet.I rarely take it out of my pocket.Comfortable leather, never feels like I will drop if I pull it out of my front pocket. I completely forgot he was there. Months later, I still stop and clutch my bag to make sure I have my wallet before heading out the door. It's not magic, you can still see it in your front pocket, but the shape is about the size of several credit cards. I have 9 items the thickness of a plastic credit card and about 6 insurance cards the thickness of a business card etc. and 6 paper bills with a tick in them. Its thickness is 5/8 inch (less than 16 mm). The seams are perfect. The leather is soft but strong. It lasts 10 or 15 years and doesn't wear out. So I just press the bottom seam to pull the cards out. It pushes the cards out just enough for me to grab and pull out prefer but I'm very happy and am considering buying two more in case I lose them or they wear out in less than 15 years But one!.or two.They will not regret it. These are the best minimalist wallets in the world.

Pros
  • ✔ DURABLE CONSTRUCTION: This minimalist wallet was designed in London, UK. It is made of high quality leather with great attention to detail. The wallet has 3 pockets and measures 4" x 2.8" x 0.1".
Cons
  • unreliable