Review on Logitech MX Keys Wireless Keyboard Black, English by Wiktor Sakowski ᠌
A valuable purchase, some advantages!
The overall score is rather 4.25, which is technically 4+ but is most certainly not 4. In general, I'm happy that I decided to purchase it. In general, I advise. Think about it! Also, keep in mind that it is far less in size than the K800. It is lot smaller. I believe that if I did not have to click between three computers, I would give some thought to whether or not I should take something. Regarding the comparison to the K800, look very carefully and reflect on what you find. "look" - it's really real, look at the arrangement of all-all keys, including the "calculator" (which for some reason shifted to the left by cm 5.6 - for some reason?!). "look" at the layout of all-all keys. The MX kit completely blew my mind, but as I've mentioned before, I need to be able to control three PCs with just one keyboard.
- - keystrokes! - ease of use with lock Fn - the ability to rapidly alter the mode of operation of a number of function keys It turns out that a thick metal keyboard is the best option when you have three computers to connect and an outstanding weight. It is very evident that you will not be successful in dragging her around the cafe. I won't go into greater detail about the benefits, as they are listed in each and every article on the network. And in contrast to the Mouse MX 3, it is written in an honest and truthful manner regarding the keyboard; read it.
- mediocre performance with the backlight control; it cannot be activated involuntarily! Yes, I don't want to save energy; I want the keys to always shine at my fingertips, in the area where the shadows fall. I am currently searching for the location of the light receiver so that I may glue it:) It would be more convenient for me if my keyboard for Windows did not have any mac-keys on it. I believe the writers could easily include an additional five "win-only" keys in the kit. Even if it meant buying these five items again, I wouldn't hesitate to do so. Unfortunately, in contrast to the K800, sound control is done through the Fn button, as is turning off the sound with the Fn button, and turning it on without using the Fn button; this seems like it should be done the other way around. lack of legs, which means that it is neither higher nor lower, just like how the author wrote it. The function keys are not physically separated from one another; however, there is typically greater gap between F4 and F5 than there is between F5 and F6. those. Fn are composed of three blocks of four keys each. It can be determined by touch whether F4 or F9 is being used. usb-c as a power source is really disappointing. What's wrong with micro?! And I'm not sure why the authors don't combine USB-C and micro-USB ports, considering the big size of the device in question. I just don't get it. I find the lock key on the far right to be awkward; as a result, I am continually touching and obstructing the computer. Why is it that the "calculator" button that was present on the K800 is not present there? very small "frame" surrounding the keyboard; literally 5 mm (save for the top); very narrow; nowhere to put the little fingers; very narrow.
