Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Dana Males ᠌ photo
1 Level
28 Review
0 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy S20 8/128 GB Smartphone, Dual: nano SIM eSIM, grey by Dana Males ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied, the product fully corresponds to the description.

In general, a good device. Let's see how it goes on. Owners of S9 and S10, who are not confused by shooting videos and photos, do not make much sense to switch. In other cases, you can consider for purchase. Got pros: Nice, solid machine. The successor to the traditions of the Galaxy S line. Not a breakthrough, but on a level. Its cons: The on-screen fingerprint scanner is a dubious find. If you only need to touch the sensor to unlock a smartphone with a scanner on the back, then two steps are required here - first activate the screen, and only then scan the fingerprint. The scanner itself is capricious. The reason why iris recognition was removed is not obvious. The reason for the rejection of the standard headphone jack is also not obvious. The lack of an adapter from Type-C to standard USB is disappointing. You have to connect to a computer without such a connector with an old wire. The camera (at least in the case of video) in the default mode gives a barely noticeable pinkish tint. Sometimes you have to do color correction on the computer. In S9, for example, this was not the case. The camera block on the rear panel sticks out a little. Debatable. It is not clear why budget smartphones can afford a slot for two SIM cards + a memory card, while the flagship makes you choose: two SIM cards, or one SIM card + a memory card.