Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Gabriela Werbliska ᠌ photo
1 Level
72 Review
1 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G 12/128 GB RU, phantom black by Gabriela Werbliska ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsuccessful purchase, I am disappointed.

If you compare this device to * twenty *, which I used for three years and then gave to my wife as a wedding present, you'll see that practically all of its flaws arise (in connection with which I now envy her). I'll just get this out of the way: I needed the best camera phone money could buy (ideally under 1,000 euros) that also had access to Google's various services. Formerly, *twenty* could be purchased for the same price—I'm guessing somewhere around 800 Euros—and they even threw in a free watch as a bonus. It was also standard practice for them to include Samsung headphones and a wireless charger. Samsung's under-glass fingerprint sensor was quickly exposed as a useless gimmick after the first few uses. Even after I've erased the prints five times, the phone still only unlocks after two or three attempts, and sometimes it even locks for 30 seconds. If you just touch the screen, it won't recognize your fingerprint, but if you press your whole finger on it and hold for a second, it will. This is in contrast to the *twenty,* which had a separate sensor at the bottom of the phone that always worked instantly. Going berserk! Two *twenty* times as long for face unlock to work. Although you appear to anticipate at least some improvement from the new processor and 12 GB of memory, all the essential software function exactly as they did on *twenty*. Alas. Achieved the camera location. The reviews all agree: this camera is a monster. When using the standard automatic photograph mode, they both provide almost the same results. With a maximum optical magnification of * twenty * and a 3x zoom. Specifically examined and compared on a massive screen. Video: The Chinese can only do 4K at 30 frames per second, the Koreans at 8, but when I set it to 4K at 60 frames per second in artificial lighting (at home in the evening), the Chinese showed better results; the colors are more vibrant, the picture is brighter overall, and the picture on the Samsung is dull and has terrible noise. Worst case scenario! The Chinese version does not have stabilization or 60 frames per second, so what is it, exactly? After three years, please show some development. Why do Koreans risk breaking such a high price? In most cases, the gadget was less than ideal. I was hoping for a lot more. Due to these two factors.

Pros
  • - Create (this can not be taken away, yes) Quick battery recharge time - Camera image stabilization via optical means (a definite plus, it was very lacking in the previous Chinese flagship camera phone) Superior visuals and a powerful zoom lens. Superior audio quality (chic)
Cons
  • - The fingerprint reader is always unreliable and uninteresting (the most annoying flaw) - Video in 4K shoots worse than the ancient Chinese flagship of 2022 (not to name brands here, let's call it *twenty*) - Photo without zoom shoots at the level of *twenty*, definitely not better - 12 gigs of RAM, and applications open with the same delay as on the old *twenty* Listed below are some of the primary drawbacks that prevent me from being an advocate for this brand.