Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Plonka ᠌ photo
1 Level
313 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 6/128 GB RU, mint by Stanislaw Plonka ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Dissatisfied with this product, bad to use.

equipment in its raw state. Given the declining economy and the dollar exchange rate, 50k is currently regarded as being reasonably priced for a smart smartphone. Yet this is untrue; despite Samsung's positioning of smart as a flagship for less money, it is actually neither a flagship nor a bad average. There have been too many concessions, and the cost is still too high. Costs shouldn't exceed $35,000 to $45,000. I strongly urge against him making a purchase because clever is not a costly item. The smartphone still manages to lag, freeze, and reset the screen brightness to 50% during holidays. Korean engineers are clueless; the software is curved and the game launcher is glitchy. Only the camera is likely one of the major pluses as it is clearly at the flagship level and I have zero concerns about it. The S10, which was previously absurdly superior in almost everything, will be less expensive. I tell him that s20 and other new models are not a gold mine for lovers of the Korean business. Although Samsung chose to follow Apple's pricing strategy in vain, at least it is largely unique and has its own operating system. There are also many other Android smartphones that are both better and more affordable than this Korean pseudo-flagship. Koreans are good at marketing, but the quality of cellphones declines year after year. Savings are felt across the board, and since the exynos is a subpar and unsuccessful stone, it's time for them to start supplying cellphones on the top dragon by 2022. Even the typical 765 dragon will perform better in powerful games owing of the 990 exinos, but autonomy also suffers tremendously. The smartphone loses frequency and uses a lot of battery life because it is so hot and running. In general, why is there 80k in a circumstance like this with the typical note 20? For the cameras' trimmed plastic bodies. If you have money, the note 20 ultra is certainly worth getting because of all the latest smarts from Samsung. But the government sells the gray for $100,000 even though it only costs about $8,000. It's just absurdly expensive for a smartphone that is nothing new. Therefore, if you have a Samsung flagship starting with the s10e, it's not worth it either. Think 20 times before buying.

Pros
  • The camera is nice, and the shell is useful. A decent screen overall, however there are some subtleties. Cool body colors and a good radio system. Personally, I prefer Samsung Pay to Google Pay. Due to the fact that my friend is a blogger, the smartphone arrived before the pre-order. The smart did not like it in general, therefore it might be a test sample that was discovered.
Cons
  • After the ate it got better, but it's still not great. It gets warm and lags. In typical toys, the 990 Exynos is unstable, delays, and freezes. Autonomy declines as a result of the delays. It got better after the tools and game launcher were forced to go down, although evidently they saved on cooling. Yes, there is a 120 GHz mode, but the sensations on this smart are strange. Compared to Chinese devices with similar screen characteristics, there are lags and a certain amount of slowness. They even made savings by including rapid charging in the kit at only 15 watts. I appreciate you adding it, Apple. Compared to smartphones from Xiaomi and Honor, poor network coverage. Wi-Fi frequently disconnects, especially while using Bluetooth headphones. Because the bluetooth connection is constantly interrupted, it does not synchronize well and does not function in the automobile, making it inconvenient to use. Since the case is made of plastic and the pseudo-flagship has large frames near the screen for 15-20k, it resembles an a51 and has a lower quality feel. The smartphone's body is also of low quality.