Review on Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens - Optimized for Canon EOS SLR Cameras by Athit Kemsatidanan ᠌

I read reviews about the lens. The people write that they lather, autofocus does not hit. Disagree. Perhaps the authors should align the lens and set it to "0" (which I did, for example). With its help, at many focal lengths (including 300mm) I got very sharp pictures and was very pleased. Here are some examples: http://cs608818. Vk. Me/v608818039/11cfd/AHmEg3dIBjQ. Jpg http://cs540107. Vk. Me/c617820/v617820229/16420/wN-5bvWHPP4. Jpg http://cs617821. Vk. Me/v617821039/13548/ncN1TnBLXso. Jpg proofs indicating camera-lens focal length: http://500px. Com/photo/76454125/emotion-(no-rules)-by-alexander-nikolaev http://500px. Com/photo/73809211/jump-by-alexander-nikolaev I own a Canon 24-70 4l is usm and despite the fact that this is an L-series, its sharpness satisfies me even less and, in my opinion, more soap, and the Canon EF 24-105L is not a competitor to the 300th at all - Here he has soap and sharpness is an order of magnitude worse. Oddly enough, it took me a long time to decide between L-70-200 and standard IS 70-300mm - I decided to buy 70-300mm and never regretted it. Make adjustment of L-ki and 300-ki - I got a bunch of 2 lenses in the general range of 24-300mm. Conclusion - see examples, decide for yourself, but I would recommend this lens not only to beginners. As for soap, I don’t know, maybe I have a good copy, but compared to how some L-ki lather, I didn’t find any problems with this.