Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Akemi Tsuruoka ᠌ photo
Tokyo
1 Level
119 Review
126.75 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy Cellphone Factory Renewed by Akemi Tsuruoka ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

A complete disaster, the product definitely did not pass the quality check!!!

And why did you make a payment before the initial tests? Yes, since the exynos hugely enraged people and the sales of the galaxy s9 were a disaster, which was the key claim made for the device. The Koreans were expected to set up their processor for the new one UI shell, but they instead took it and ran into difficulty with double strength. 3. Value decline. After a month, the device is now 58k instead of 78k, and is available for purchase. You do, however, maintain prices for at least six months, which at least serves to convey the worth of the good. next purchase? That's correct; there are only reasons not to buy, not reasons to buy. 4. A selfie camera cutout. If the phone is split into two programs, for example, cropping is also at the camera's border, and the functionality of a great many applications is cut off precisely along this boundary. In other words, the diagonal is now somewhere around 6.1 and not 6.4. Purchasing the Note 9 instead, which has a fully functional big screen without any clips, is more rational. I answered the phone, including for work, and this is a big negative. No esim, 5. without eSIM, the most costly Android phone. Why is it necessary? For me, leaving one SIM card, the second eSIM, and a flash disk for 128 would be quite convenient. Nice and handy, but not this. 6. The under-screen fingerprint scanner performs abhorrently. You may occasionally be unable to unlock your phone. And once more, I'm haunted by the cost of intelligence. What the hell, though? Is there anything I could have gotten for more money? I come to the conclusion that I would never buy again after two months of ownership. I make no recommendations to anyone. More cannot be taken; thousands for 35 S10 and over can. I want to bring to your attention that the same S9 + hung for 34590 for the action a week ago. Now, accepting it in exchange for that amount of money and even growth is not awful. Because no one wants them and they remain in the warehouse for months, freezing the money of stores, they are drained for that amount of money. The same xiaomi mi9 or the galaxy a70 are more options. In general, the Galaxy A line appears to be quite favorable; if I hadn't known better, I would have never identified it as a Samsung product. But in order to buy, the market drove even such sluggish people to adapt.

Pros
  • Although it is unfortunate, we must begin with the virtues. 1. This screen is very trim and luscious. Yet it appears to me that there is nothing worse available right now that costs less and is just as effective. 2. Software It's a delight to use, they did a terrific job. Everything is in its proper location, the animations are not worse than those on the iPhone, and the work is flowing and natural. In other words, the firmware in an A70 makes it dozens of times better than the identical Xiaomi device. And I couldn't help but assume that if you give the Galaxy A70 a promotion, Xiaomi will typically lose a thousand miles. Nonetheless, Samsung started to take on the Mas brand, and this is significant. 3. The position of the device in the hand. The screen is the same as on the identical iPhone, but the overall gadget is significantly more compact and smaller. 4. Elegant style. 5. It also takes good pictures; I particularly like the camera's fish-eye feature, which allows you to shoot up close and capture anything you want in the frame.
Cons
  • The foundation of my review is now at hand. Notwithstanding the benefits I mentioned, I believe the Samsung was simply unsuccessful. And for that reason. 1. Prices were taken directly from the ceiling. The price is exactly twice as much for the filling that is used in s10. Additionally, a month later, the company unveiled a line of galaxy A smartphones that are essentially on par with the S10 + (same screen, same cameras, same firmware, same battery, slightly slower processor, but it will still suffice for the eye, there is an NFC chip), BUT can be purchased for less than $20,000! Take advantage of wise promotions for advancement. Indeed, even for a gentle spirit of 25 to accept, well, isn't it 78? What will be absent from it? Sure, reverse charging is pointless, but for me, it wasn't wasted. Processor 2. By using an Exynos processor, they bring a galaxy to us in the year 2022. This percentage is based on a sample from last year and older buildings. Since the identical Snapdragon 855 is around 30% more powerful, Samsung cannot make money off of this and instead pushes their outdated product. You are just quiet in the examinations on YouTube; there isn't even a question of competitiveness there. How do you like it, that is? Install gear from last year, which is inferior than smart for $25k, yet sell Smart for $80,000? This is a major letdown for me. Consider the same iPhone. Prices can be broken, but their processors are among the best in the world for devices, and you part with a lot of money knowing there is simply no alternative; you can either buy or switch to an android phone. But again, the market can shift 180 degrees every three months, and despite the intense competition, the fact that last year's gear was crammed into their flagship, they cheerfully claim a record dip in sales. How does it feel? So, why not just sell what is currently available on the market if you can't create a processor that is competitive? I have no idea how to describe it. In real life, I would not have purchased the phone if I had not paid for it in advance through a pre-order.

Similar reviews