Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens, black by Jnis Bukovskis ᠌

Ugly. Why is this pricey glass being sold when there is a 1.8 that does not smear? The aperture that actually works on my 1.8 is 1.8. I did not even consider shooting them with a more shallow depth of field. It is successful in every way. This one as well. It works great with my Canon 5D. To be more specific, I don't make use of it, but I still suffer. Constant misses. Those who argue that the picture is superior to that of 1.8 = demonstrate a crafty mentality. The scenario has hardly changed in any significant way. This is because the aperture of 1.4, which should be working, is not. This naturally results in better bokeh. And with version 1.8, the picture is exactly the same. It's very likely that I'll sell it. It doesn't matter to me that such trash is being sold. In addition, I have a Jupiter 37a super lens that I use for portraits; despite the fact that it is manual focus, this lens is really crisp and gorgeous.