Review on Canon EOS 6D Body camera, black by Van Chayathon ᠌

I decided to change the brand with another one, so I shot a video. At first glance, it appears to be some type of pointless 6D. Dish for soap that is light and compact. The image of a spacecraft emerges as the second impression following use in hostile environments. Whoever films the video should know that the subject's true working ISO setting is 12800. Colors. The colors in Mark II are fantastic. Yet, the six are even more awesome. In addition, there are none of the agonizingly recognizable distortions in green or red; everything is smooth. The microphone that comes with the 6D is a step above that of the other brand. Even yet, I found myself using an external microphone far less frequently. Protection against dust and moisture is an Important. I walked with him, but it wasn't raining the whole time, so everything is fine. Yet, one thing is certain: the level of security offered by this note is, in all likelihood, less than that offered by a three-ruble bill. It is mentioned here in the reviews that the six are terrified of high humidity, and in addition to that, they are terrified of a vacuum cleaner. I fully refute this statement. As a consequence of this, I started to prefer the weight because it made my hand feel less fatigued. At the end of the shooting day, the hand of a pensioner mark II just dropped off by itself. The ergonomics took some getting used to, but in general, the design is well thought out. Turning on the device and playing the video is a very easy and convenient process. Regarding the wheels, I have no criticisms. It is unfortunate that there is not yet a stable version of Magic Lantern available for it despite the fact that the shutter is quite quiet. Mowing is the only activity that takes on here. Yet, it appears that everything is going according to plan so far. It seems to me that the price difference between the 6D and the mark III is too great, while the difference in terms of video quality is negligible. If you have to choose between the two, I would recommend going with the 6D. Who cares? It sends a signal to an external monitor, which in this case is a Mark II, and the signal is reduced to 420p. But with a monitor that's only five inches, does it really matter? Everyone experiences it in a different way. I do not care. In conclusion, at such a low price, an outstanding contemporary military vehicle.