The only watch on the market for Android smartphones that has Bluetooth version 5.0, Near Field Communication (NFC), and Wi-Fi all in one bottle. At the same time, however, they have some "subsidence" in the sense that they have the presence of some other useful characteristics in comparison to other smart watches. The advantages of it include the following: 1) The availability of Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, and NFC, as well as the capability to view images and movies, synchronize the device with a smartphone, pair the device with Tws headphones, and utilize the player with those headphones from the internal memory of the watch. 2) Signup. Minimalist. Laconically. Presentable. Comfortable. 3) The availability of multifunctional, exclusive software developed by the company. 4) The existence of an electrical bezel around the screen. 5) A high-quality microphone and speaker, allowing you to make and take calls on a nearby smartphone if you have one in your immediate vicinity. 6) Reliable Bluetooth connection that allows for a maximum of fifty meters of separation between paired devices (if both support BT 5.0) 7) An evaluation of how well the Bixby voice assistant can be used. 8) A huge number of dials, each of which has a unique set of features and functions. 9) The capability of installing extra software programs on the device (browser, fitness monitoring, etc.) 10) A large variety of customization options, both for the outside of the smartwatches (which may be purchased through third-party resources like Ali) and at the software level. Got cons: 1) Active usage with all functions enabled has a negative impact on autonomy, bringing the total down to 30-36 hours (at the same time, active use of all functions is realistically unrealizable and impracticable; I designed these conditions particularly for evaluating autonomy). In normal, everyday conditions, a full charge would have lasted me 76 hours (based on a heart rate reading taken every 10 minutes). When compared to the Huawei watch gt 2, this number is nearly twice as high (in the absence of NFC and Wi-Fi). 2) The clock sensor, despite the fact that it is facing the hand, somehow emits a very bright green beam of light that resembles a laser. This beam of light transforms into a real blaster during the night and tries to pierce the user's sleepy eyes. 3) The price is obviously unreasonable due to the fact that they are associated with the name of that brand. It is possible that a drop of 15 to 20 percent would make it more acceptable in the existing market for smartwatches. 4) The inability to establish additional daily activity targets throughout the day (if I find it, I will add a review comment). 5) The wake-up motion that the user makes by turning their hand does not operate when the user is in the "laying" posture. 6) The default strap has a fixation mechanism that can be a little bit unpleasant (subjectively). 7) The item does not come with a power converter to allow charging from a wall outlet (rather, a lack of equipment). 8) The relative difficulty of the initial setup for users of mobile devices who have little to no prior expertise (it was difficult for me due to the presence of a certain experience).
SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch (46Mm
259 Review
SAMSUNG Galaxy Buds Live: True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancelling & Wireless Charging Case - Mystic Bronze (US Version)
252 Review
Global Version HUAWEI Band 6 Fitness Tracker Smartwatch for Men and Women, 1.47ββ AMOLED Color Screen, All-Day SpO2 and Heart Rate Monitoring, 2-Week Battery Life, 5ATM Waterproof - Orange
190 Review
Sennheiser HD280PRO: π§ Next-Generation Pro Audio Headphones
260 Review