Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kristiyana Setiyawat ᠌ photo
Lives in Jakarta, Indonesia
1 Level
140 Review
240 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy A72 (SM-A725M/DS) by Kristiyana Setiyawat ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

Considering the price, I think I got a decent deal, thus I'm happy with the purchase. The following are some of its benefits: 1) The photographs taken by the camera are of usable quality. 2) fast enough for most uses without being a bottleneck (navigator, YouTube, opening office files.) Thirdly, the overall sound quality is good enough to be acceptable from the speakers. 4) Do not glue any glass or films onto it; after a month of use and carrying it around in your pocket with change and keys (I'm terrible at taking care of my phones), the screen still looks brand new; greasy fingerprints wipe away practically instantly, and the glass and its coating are just superb. The glass and coating are top-notch. Some of its drawbacks include the following: Disliked: 0) The phone's hands-free microphone is terrible, making it nearly impossible for callers to hear you even while using the speaker function. One cannot overstate the significance of this (I checked it on 2 phones from DIFFERENT Samsung FACTORIES, because at first I thought that the problem was only mine) We were surprised by three things: 1) the screen's viewing angles, 2) the screen's relative heaviness, and 3) the screen's lack of brightness in everyday use. The battery will only survive for 2 days if you don't use the phone at all (only 30 minutes of screen time per day in vatsap, 5-6 photos, and up to 10 phone calls), but it will last for 1 day with heavy use if there's a large reserve (35-40 percent is always a minimum). 4) The volume is really low, but the sound quality is fine. If you're in a completely silent flat, for instance, and you switch on some tunes, you'll be able to make out every word. If you take it outside and try to listen with it on full volume, you'll find that it's barely audible. 5) A slow, low-quality fingerprint scanner with an extremely small scanning area; failing to scan your entire finger because of a gap of only a few millimeters.

Similar reviews