When I saw that the cheapest version of this shoe was $143 for me, I jumped at the opportunity to spend the money because I don't need to buy a shoe that costs more than any other running shoe I've ever bought. When my ex-colleague bought them and wore them to the office with a pair of golf pants, I really wanted a pair like this, but to be honest I was jealous of his superior physique and wish I had more self-discipline after 3 years of a terrible pandemic. The last pair of running shoes I bought was an orange Saucony that said "This is how I bake!". and were $60 from the Sierra Trading Post. The last pair I really liked was a pair of ASICS Gel Excites I bought from Kohl for about $70, but I'm worried the new version won't be as comfortable. I'm usually lucky with Brooks and now I have a decent pair. One pair I miss a lot was the Mizuno Wave Runner, which felt like memory foam but ruined the magic insole the following year. Every running shoe I've ever bought has cost less than this at the lowest price. If you feel that an extra $100 on shoes adds comfort or durability, or has some social value, such as: For example, to give the workers a salary that pays them housing, an avocado on toast and, God forbid, a pension, then I want to send you an email. about how the FBI secretly takes the gun you stashed in your bunker along with 100 pounds of hydroponically grown weed. You never know until you send me a free pair to post on my social media pages about how awesome they are.