With its pros: Completely satisfied. Value for money. I'll be brief: Anything! Different cons: The price jumps to inadequate sizes. But this is not a shortcoming of this processor.

I bought it and have no regrets. Thought Ruzen 7 or 5. Decided 5. Seven is greatly overvalued in money. While there is little point in overpaying for a top model. All that you need to squeeze out of the processor, this five will give you. The games are running great. Video processing, transcoding (I make videos) is excellent. I don’t know if there is anything better, since there is no need to improve it further. I recommend it.

Different pros: Excellent stone. In the CPU-Z test, it almost catches up with the Intel 8700, which now costs about 22022! Has some cons: Acceleration is frankly weak, the performance gain is meager.

I was lucky to buy an eight-core 16-thread amd ryzen 5 1600. I overclocked to 4000 MHz, while in many places it turned out to be slower than the core i5 2500k@4600 six years ago, which suited me, but my mother died from it. These are all *paq and cm type archivers, regardless of compiler, winrk, mp3packer single-threaded optimizers, pnggauntlet and mozjpeg. Photoshop works slower, many filters for avisynth, sony idc. Almost all tests and games are 3d, which are up to 2022. And this is with a…