👟 ASICS GT 2000 Women's Running Shoes in Piedmont for Women at Athletic Store Review

UPDATE: Run 26.2 miles in it during the TCS NYC Virtual Marathon yesterday. Comfortable, do not hurt the legs, no calluses, do not hurt the foot. I'm amazed I can walk the next day! Fit like the Gel Kayano 26, lots of space in the forefoot and great Flyte foam in the shoe! I never had to break them in, they fit great from the start :)

They arrived quickly and fit me perfectly. I need a 2A width and my foot is bigger too so I'm really struggling to find the right shoes. I wish they were in other colorways (it seems that only one style of women's Asics is made in narrow widths - and that a shoe only comes in one or two colors. I wish there were more color choices for people with tall , narrow, flat feet but I was still very happy to find this pair!

I've worn the GT 2000 series for years and years and years. They've been great for a few years. They were good for a few years. For me, this version is: Painful. I only wore this shoe at home for a few hours to test its fit and comfort. This design hurt my legs and ankles almost immediately. After trying for 4 hours to get used to it, I gave up. However, we all have different feet and different needs. As you can see this shoe has 5 star reviews so it's obvious that it works for some and doesn't

I love these shoes! Asics is the only brand I know of that makes running shoes with overpronation. (I've tried Nike, Reebok, Fila with no relief). I have just bought my third pair of ASICS and will continue to be loyal to this brand. heal pain. The pain was so severe that it was difficult for me to just walk; although I kept walking. Since I bought ASICS almost 2 years ago, my right heel pain is completely gone, my left heel is almost completely gone (the left one was much worse). I am now…

I broke these shoes in after a couple of 30 minute walks and found them comfortable with great support - probably the most comfortable new shoe I've ever bought. I've never felt a stinging in my arthritic knees, which is unusual. I usually wear a 7-1/2 M, but following the advice of some reviewers, I ordered a half size up. The shoe is still snug fitting but there is plenty of room in the toe box. The only reason for 4 stars instead of 5 is that some buyers find the shoes too small or too tight

I have been wearing Asics for at least 15 years. It's time for a new pair. The same GT 2000 I bought was a size 8 which I ordered in the latest GT 2000 9. They have since added more padding which made the shoe appear smaller to me. Another thing that changed was their one-piece mesh upper, which felt better on the top of the foot BUT I didn't feel like it was reinforced enough in key areas like the older models to close the toe box administer. I could see how a worn toenail could snap through…

After spending nights searching for the right shoes and reading some genuine and misleading reviews, I went to Google and YouTube and finally got the top 5 Aesics Gel Technology running shoes which like GT abridged were number one. Then the problems with the choice of the GT began. Is it 7, 8 or 9? It's 1000 9 or 2000 9. Lots of popups but the reviews were very helpful and viola! That won my heart. and i took the time to read the asics gel tech reviews. First I got a GT 1000 9, but the GT 2000…