The quality of the pictures is very even nothing, if a good lens for the device, of course, with a whale 18-55 you will not get anything special. This camera is not for one year, it will last you for several years by the ears, especially for a beginner) Has some pros The first thing I will say is a large capacity battery! I have enough for three days, if every day for an hour (minimum) to photograph! As for the charge, you don’t have to worry at all. Swivel screen for sure! Add. backlit…

Considering the price-quality ratio, the model is very good, I advise everyone! True, there is already a problem with the purchase, because they often try to sell used cameras of this particular model (I don’t know why. Probably, new ones are no longer imported to 2022) Some pros: Great model! The battery is strong enough to last a day. Very pleased with the second screen with backlight. Sometimes (especially when shooting the night sky) it helps a lot. Also a great feature that some cameras…

good camera but pricey. Used Canon 1000D, 550D, 50D. The great fifty dollars Canon 50D wins in everything . but the video is so unnecessary . Pros: 1 Its size is really large, when you hold it in your hands, that is, the feeling that you have a professional SLR in your hands 2 Management has changed dramatically, for those who will not have the first DSLR, they will have to relearn 3 on the right, instead of the mode dial, a monochrome screen appeared, which gives out the most necessary…

In my opinion, this is the best crop camera for the money. With his work, he copes with a bang. I have owned it for over 3 years and have no regrets. Different pros: Excellent assembly, no backlash. The battery is almost impossible to discharge - very tenacious. ISO, BB, WB do an excellent job, no worse than "pro" level cameras. Photos are colorful and beautiful. If you put good expensive lenses, then looking at the pictures taken, you get the feeling that you are holding the same Mark 2 in…

I used 400d kit. I bought a Tamron 17-50 f2.8. I practically did not notice the difference in quality - I decided that they had screwed up and needed to save up for CANON's L-optics. Decided to change the carcass. Began to look closely at the 60D. I read reviews about 60D - I was disappointed and decided to wait for 8D (or whatever comes out there). I suffered with my 400D until one day I saw a photo report from "my" Tamron. Surprised, I went to look for the reason . I tried 60D and the lens…

There is nothing special to compare with - Panasonic FZ 50 and worse owned soap dishes. Therefore, a good device shoots with dignity, a lot depends, as always, on the photographer . They never made a button - a Masterpiece . I am satisfied with the purchase - I shot Video - after flashing. not really of course, but it's not a video camera. Yes, actually, it is very unusual to shoot a video. Expensive, but I bought it anyway.

I switched from 40D, got used to it right away, If you compare them, then for me both are good. According to other reviews: The case is not magnesium - do not chop nuts, and it’s not yet a fact that polycarbonate or Mg is stronger (who doesn’t have a hammer). Lies BB - shoot in RAW. The buttons are not there (I am surprised at people who proudly write that this is their first SLR). And a lot of little quibbles. There are flaws everywhere, and 60D is not a pro, but for home, family and friends…

I recently changed my old sony H2 to this miracle from America. There he cost almost 10,000 cheaper than in 2022, but the question remains with warranty service. A fast, convenient camera, a swivel display eliminates all problems when shooting from awkward positions, 9 cross-point autofocus - believe me, that's enough! ISO 1600 fully operational sensitivity at 18MP, for the first time the built-in flash solves problems when shooting indoors with well-set metering. Every day I am convinced of…

This model clearly shows the transition of quantity into quality. The swivel screen, low-noise shutter, 18 megapixels and the top display allow you to shoot "from the belly" or in a cafe, among people, getting real portraits. Started using it with 50mm 1.4 - it's amazing how easy it is to get a good shot. Pleasantly surprised by the ability to zoom in the LifeView mode, which allows you to better capture focus. The video mode is very good. Finally, I can fully use the 430 flash, because. now…

I was tormented by choosing between 7D and 60D for almost a year. As a result, I decided that the advantages of the seven are not worth the 20k difference, and I think I did the right thing! Owned a 450d carcass for 4 years. The difference is huge! progress from soap to 450, and from 450 to 60! the tokina 16-50 f/2.8 lens literally came to life. photos come out sharp juicy, very satisfied. the front focus disappeared somewhere (toly autofocus in 60d is better if something was corrected in the

Bought two years ago. I picked up my first DSLR in 1970. Even taking it out of the box, I was surprised at how the body fell into my hand . Perhaps the EOS 7D and EOS 50D are better, and the EOS 5D will give odds . I do not recommend the 18-55 lens, it is for the younger models and without stabilizer. An excellent lens with high resolution, a very rich set of presets that allow you to quickly select a shooting mode. Thoughtful arrangement of controls. The presence of an HDMI output: you can use

During use, the following points were noticed: Back, Front focus with full-frame Sigmas of the EX-DG series both on zooms and on fixes, can be corrected by re-focusing, but when reporting 25% of the material is still in the basket, on 5dmk2 there is no such problem arose with the same optics. An external monitor connected via HDMI, while recording a video, will not work, the percentage does not pull it. 2 cards of 32GB each are enough for all occasions), all cards are 10 class 20-30mb /…

Although this is my first SLR camera, before that there was not even a simple soap dish, I got used to it pretty quickly (maybe because theoretically I was more or less savvy). Maybe I’ll say stupidity, but with such a camera, in principle, you can earn money at the very least if your hands grow from the right place, since there are photographers who work on 1000D. If you are thinking between what to choose, check out the mat. part to understand whether you need these functions or not. Because…

I always have 15-85, if necessary I put 50 / 1.4, three more filters and that's it! That's all you need in 99% of cases. To make better pictures, you need a device with other components much more expensive and hands much straighter and appropriate training. Understand how you want. I had experience in using different techniques, I was delighted with this, the percentage of defective photos taken on the go, without preparation, is minimal. Yes, and not 200tr hanging on the side also means…

I bought a whale one, from 17-85 and immediately 50 1.4 As an experienced amateur, I must say that I am satisfied even with 17-85 no XA and the sharpness is quite satisfactory, and throughout the field. The fix with its sharpness and bokeh is still up to the occasion. The camera has great opportunities, you need to know the instructions well, get used to the buttons, it takes time. Do not waste money on L-ki to learn how to use what is. Good lens and Canon 15-85 but it doesn't have macro.

Despite the fact that this is my first SLR camera, I tried to objectively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages. In the end, I can say that this is a great camera. With an 18-135 is lens, you can save up to 5 thousand if you do not buy separately. Lens - Taiwan. My copy was good. For a beginner, it is difficult to choose the best lens. Now I will say a few words about buying a camera. It will be especially important for those who, like me, will buy a SLR camera for the first time.…

I took this camera at the end of April. In the whale version 18-55mm(3.5-5.6) is. I can say this - before that, the main camera was Canon S5 IS. The first moments 60d took pictures in sharpness inferior to s5mu. At first I thought that the whale lens was such a crap) But then I realized that this lens needs to be felt, to feel the operating parameters. Experiments began with the search for the most working diaphragms. So, at 18-55mm, the best picture is given - a portrait at F5.0 aperture (at…

This is my first SLR camera and the first review on this site) Before buying a camera, I read a huge number of articles on the Internet, but here everything is most accessible and vitally written, and most importantly, briefly and clearly The camera was bought more than a year ago, to be honest, I can't get enough of it, great photos are obtained. About the mode lock, it doesn’t interfere with work at all, you just need to get used to it and then you just stop noticing it) The swivel screen

In general, I'm satisfied. I started thinking about 60k, after a review about it in Digital Photo by Boris Muradov, he praised it. And then I saw it in the nth store for 29500, and decided not to pull it, borrowed money and bought it, I didn’t regret it (a week later the price rose again to quite average), it’s quite an adequate option to switch from entry-level lines. Only for autofocus it's a shame.

That's actually all. Summing up, I can say that this camera is absolutely not suitable for reportage shooting. Unless the reporting is in ideal conditions with great lighting. Those. 100500 frames per second, trying to shake skaters or rollers in flight will not work. Extreme shooting in nightclubs and at concerts is also not his forte (although if you wish, you can achieve a more or less decent result). It is more suitable for leisurely studio, street and creative shooting. The Canon 60D can…