Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
crosselec antenna 2009 2021 challenger charger logo

Crosselec Antenna 2009 2021 Challenger Charger Review

2

·

Poor

Revainrating 2.5 out of 5  
Rating 
2.3
📡 Antenna Toppers

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Crosselec Antenna 2009 2021 Challenger Charger
img 2 attached to Crosselec Antenna 2009 2021 Challenger Charger
img 3 attached to Crosselec Antenna 2009 2021 Challenger Charger
img 4 attached to Crosselec Antenna 2009 2021 Challenger Charger

Description of Crosselec Antenna 2009 2021 Challenger Charger

Charger or Challenger antenna has 2 different types, one with shark fin and the other with a low Base cover antenna. Most users like the shark fin antenna, we specially designed it for this . The product is a perfect upgrade from the original low Base cover antenna to shark fin antenna. The product is compatible with Dodge Charger Dodge Challenger which with the original low Base cover antenna. Simple installation, with double-sided tape on the back, directly attached, 1 minute to complete. Because of the sunroof and front and rear glass, black color can be matched with any color model.

Reviews

Global ratings 2
  • 5
    0
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Garbage Antenna Topper - Waste of Money

Based on my experience this antenna topper was a total waste of money .Despite its SLEEK design, it did not improve the radio signal at all. The only pro is that it looks nice from a distance. However, the cons outweigh this one pro - it is cheaply made and breaks easily. Save yourself the hassle and skip this one..

Pros
  • Improved signal quality and reception
Cons
  • Installation process can be challenging for those with limited experience with car antennas

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Not suitable for chargers from 2015 and later.

The description says that it is suitable for a charger from 2021. That is not right. It only fits up to 2014 with low mount. I should have paid more attention to the photos. But I didn't, so I only spent $30.

Pros
  • Stable test results
Cons
  • Some problems