Its pros: easy to install and operate. Printing is fast and high quality. With its cons: plastic is cheap, even to the touch. when opening / closing the lids, the feeling that something will break now . :-)

I am very pleased with the purchase, the ink seems to be enough for a long time, for such money I bought an apparatus of the type and do not worry, as soon as the ink runs out, I will try to fill in non-native ones, I will compare it with the original. If it dies, I'll buy a new one. Pros: very economical and economical)) the print quality is excellent, the management is quite simple, there is a factory CISS Some cons: there is not enough speed for printing photos, it is slow and does not pick…

Photo paper for printing accepts up to 200 g / m2, if it is denser, then the feeder makes heart-rending sounds, as if it were dying. Nevertheless, this does not prevent the feeder from accepting photo paper with a magnetic layer of 300 + g / m2, first such sheets are run to idle, then it clings and prints, it seems that everything is due to the softness of the sheet. You need to try to monitor the level of ink, when airing the PG, you will have to drain a lot of them. The print is excellent…

After 3000 prints, the PG floated . The nozzles began to disappear, it began to streak in standard and lower modes . despite the fact that the donars were pumped and the PG was washed with a special solution. In general, the conclusion is this: The device is clearly not worth the money, is clearly not finalized, clearly does not meet the stated characteristics and is clearly designed to regularly burn the user)) Changed my review from one to four stars after a while. Because This device…

Great printer for the money for family needs Has some pros: If you are not a professional, then the print quality is excellent, for printing photos in an album or on a wall in the house, that's it. Sooo economical, using not very actively for a year and a half and half the ink, not a lot of photos were printed, but not a few, family needs are fully covered. Reports / abstracts to school are printed for the child. Its cons: I would say the software is not very convenient, you have to convert…

Long originally refueled with ink. 20 minutes. Already excited. Read it as it should be. I immediately loaded the print of 1200 full-color A4 sheets without borders. Printing was 3 days continuously. Approximately in the middle it stopped and gave a diaper error ? How is that in general? Okay, I, it’s not difficult for me, I downloaded the program, reset the error, and who doesn’t fumble, carry it to the service ?

In the comments they write that it does not capture paper well. I didn’t have such problems either on A4 or on 10x15. It also depends on the quality of the paper. Use good consumables and there will be no problems. They also correctly noticed that there is no cover that closes the paper feed tray. But I just put envelopes with photo paper on top of the tray and that's enough.

Bought for my eldest daughter, a schoolgirl. Before buying with a predilection, I asked her if the printer would be used, if it would dry out idle. I asked in vain, I print almost every day, both for myself and my friends, and now my youngest daughter also got a taste of it)). And what do I mean, CISS allows you not to worry too much about the budget. Recently I saw her photo collage with pictures of a pop group from the network, I even asked her if she printed it herself. The quality, in my…

Took three years ago. It crackles, howls, but the print is almost flawless. The carriage motor was defective, other complaints were made above in the "flaws". Pros: 1). CISS. This says a lot. 2). It follows from point 1: you can pour native and non-native ink. Refueling is convenient, I think. Visually visible ink level. 3). Square on all sides, compact. 4). When the warranty ends, it's awfully easy to just pull the waste drain out of the diaper compartment. Programmatically dropping the level…

So that the printer does not dry out, that is, the head of the printer. At least once a week on plain paper, a color photo is enough for a couple and it will delight you for many years! paper for photo printing is better to take 200g \ m2, matte is just an excellent print on it. I do not advise you to take Lomond, I found a cactus company for myself. The paper is snow-white, the photos are bright and saturated

Joined the organization. I chose the model myself. Recommended by Epson. Now I'm completely disappointed. While using it, I almost sat. I do not recommend to purchase. Better take a closer look at the equipment of other manufacturers. Now printing. But streaks from time to time. Cleaning several times helps. But not for long. We print with stripes. Already used to it. In general, don't take it. Too expensive toy. It even seems to me that positioning is a breach. In general, the trash is still…