I have been using filter jugs for more than 15 years. There is no ideal one, and everyone can find something that does not suit you. Here is what I had: "Barrier Style", "Barrier Norm", "Barrier Eco", and this "Provence" First of all, they choose everything according to - “I liked it externally”, and only then comments pop up. What are the comments on the listed ones (except for Provence): a small volume of water, unstable ("Style") For all models, the upper part is not attached to the body…

Below are some advantages: Beautiful design. There is a tally for when the cartridge needs to be replaced. Some cons: The nose cap is not very sturdy. Might break soon. In addition, the capacity of the unfiltered container is doubled as compared to the volume of the jug. You need to fill it in twice for it to be considered complete. It is not possible to lower the lid))

Advantages that vary: Elegant construction. A cartridge replacement counter is included. Weak nose cap is one drawback. Expected to fail soon. And the jug's capacity is double that of the filtered version. You'll need to fill it out twice to make a full call. It's impossible to lower the lid.

The design is stunning, which is a definite pro. A cartridge replacement counter is included. Negatives include a flimsy nose cap. Expected to fail soon. The filtered water container is half as big as this one. You'll need to fill it out twice to make a full call. There's no way to get the top down)

Some pros: Beautiful design. There is a tally for when the cartridge needs to be replaced. The nose cap is not very sturdy, for example. Might break soon. In addition, the capacity of the unfiltered container is doubled as compared to the volume of the jug. You need to fill it in twice for it to be considered complete. It is not possible to lower the lid))

Got pros: Beautiful design. There is a tally for when the cartridge needs to be replaced. The nose cap is not very sturdy, which is a drawback. Might break soon. In addition, the capacity of the unfiltered container is doubled as compared to the volume of the jug. You need to fill it in twice for it to be considered complete. It is not possible to lower the lid))

Below are some advantages: The body of the jug is made of a plastic that is sturdy, but not hard in the traditional sense. It does not make any noise when placed on the table, yet it appears to spring back into place. Some cons: A counter for the amount of cartridges used that is really awkward and poorly thought out. In place of the customary date and month, there are some percentages that are unintelligible. Simple to remove, for instance, in the event that you need to clean the roof. And…

The reviewer's claim that only a little amount of water may be stored in the top compartment is baseless; fill it up twice at most if you anticipate having a thirsty party.

A respectable volume before changing the cartridge, both by itself and by the quantity of filtered water. What does the counter, by the way, tell you about? Here, you need to exercise additional caution as the lid opens. The volume drawn is measured as a sum of all openings. The cartridge is already there; I haven't replaced it, but from what I can see, getting a new one won't be a problem. In terms of water, there is a noticeable difference between before and after the jug. Of course, I still…

A volume that is sufficient when taken both by itself and in relation to the amount of water that can be filtered before the cartridge has to be replaced. As a side note, can you tell me what the counter provides information on? Reacts to the opening of the lid; you will need to use greater caution in this situation. Each opening contributes to the overall volume drawn into account. It comes with the cartridge; I haven't had to swap it out yet, but if I understand it correctly, purchasing a…

Super exaggerated volume! Filtration tanks are REALLY less than a liter. Specially took a measuring container. In fact, if you fill it up to the very eyeballs, there will barely be a liter of filtered water. Further, if you successively fill in the container for filtration twice, then the jug will not be able to hold the filtered water. In short, without pouring the filtered water out of the jug, but pouring it only into the filtration tank, you will not get even 2 liters of purified water…

With its pros. i cleaning, comfortable volume, tritan plastic like glass. Cons below: I didn't look at the measurements when I ordered. Turned out to be quite large

The filter is made in the shape of a classic jug, but at the same time it is slightly narrowed from the sides. This gives stability and compactness at the same time. But it won't fit on the refrigerator door! For me it is not critical. The volume of the filling tank (ladle) - 1.25 liters. In principle, not bad, given that I fill it not completely empty. The volume of the jug itself is capable of accommodating two buckets, although the second is filtered much longer than the first. The counter…

There is little information about the product and it is inaccurate. Especially with a quick choice - with a lack of time. It is also unclear - because it is not indicated in any way - on what principle does the counter of the past water work - each time the lid is opened, does it consider that the indicated 4.2 liters of water have been poured into it? Or does it somehow "wind" the flowing water?

I liked the shape of the jug, the flip tor lid and the smart meter, as well as the material from which it is made. A large water resource of one cartridge - 350 liters, an important factor, given their high price.

The replacement filter resource counter is interestingly implemented - the arrow moves to zero, depending on the amount of opening of the cover for pouring water, being connected with it by a mechanical transmission. On the other hand, it's not 100% accurate. Got pros: Norm filter. Spacious. But not too huge either. Water from the bowl filters a little more than 3 minutes, while new. Doesn't smell like plastic. The replaceable filter sits well, does not pass. Its cons: If you want to pour…

I will experiment with other types of cartridges. But, to be honest, I did not expect to get such a weak result on the resource :((( Has some pros 1. Cute design. 2. Successful design of the lid + the presence of an opening counter that automatically counts the number of fillings. 3. The filtration quality was good at first: unpleasant odors disappeared from the water, scale did not form in the kettle. Those who live in Khimki know how poor the quality of the water here is, rusty, hard and…

This is the second one. I took one for an apartment, and the second for a hacienda. I immediately bought an A5 module (2 pcs included)

Has some pros More effective than "Barrier". The pitcher is big enough for 2 full bowls. Different cons: Rather a nitpick, for a 1.8 liter teapot there is a little lack of volume, but this is corrected by double pouring the bowl.

The upper part, into which water is poured, is noticeably small in capacity relative to the capacity of the jug (liter), but this is not a minus, rather an unusual difference