Pros
- - Performance - Temperature - Graphic arts
Cons
- Well, except that the price is 6250 r
Pros
- Temperature, good performance, low power consumption, runs well on a normal motherboard, given that it does not have the "K" suffix.
Cons
- The boxed cooler is still not very efficient, the idle temperature on the cores is 40 degrees, in processor-dependent games it can jump up to 70. It does not exceed 60 on the lid in games. But if you put good cooling, it will be cold. But my case is poorly ventilated, there it is It probably gets hot, but not much.
Pros
- Fast, modern, inexpensive (relatively) processor. Unlocked multiplier (3570K), under certain conditions, the stone accelerates perfectly (see comment). 22 nm manufacturing process - it's nice to feel at the forefront of progress :-) The built-in good video core - I don’t remember how many years I haven’t played games, and my needs don’t extend beyond playing FullHD video and simple 3D modeling, but in general it can do more. Increased performance and survivability compared to Sandy Bridge (according to the generalized experience of foreign colleagues-overclockers, and in their own way too).
Cons
- Overclocking has certain *features* (not "shortcomings") in comparison with the corresponding processors based on the Sandy Bridge architecture. Again, if you believe the comrades on foreign forums, the heat-removing layers do not have the most optimal structure, which somewhat reduces the cooling efficiency (if you remake the cover, at a risk to the processor, you can win up to ten degrees). Not exactly a drawback, but an interesting fact - the temperature of the first and fourth cores in my copy is always 5-6 degrees less than the second and third. At first I thought that I applied the thermal paste crookedly, but when I redid it, the same thing remained. I think this is normal with existing processor manufacturing technologies.
Pros
- Good performance pci-e 3.0 support 22mm technology
Cons
- I was very disappointed in the temperature, during acceleration, the tin is heated like.
Pros
- price for this class, performance, overclocking
Cons
- poorly designed thermal interface and generally high heat dissipation during overclocking
Pros
- Fast. Not hot. Although, after i3, you can’t call it cold either. Feels great in games. I did not notice that this processor needed overclocking. And that's how it works with all games.
Cons
- Until I noticed. There is a suspicion that at the moment only the price can be attributed to the disadvantages. And then, if you really find fault.
Pros
- He himself is a great dignity
Pros
- low temperature. Intel reliability.
Cons
- the price is high
Pros
- /Cold/ / Consumes little energy / /For maximum energy saving, it lowers-increases the frequency depending on the load/ /Suitable for all everyday tasks/
Cons
- Not found.
Pros
- Cheap, efficient enough, heats up moderately, not picky about cooling.
Cons
- No
Pros
- Great CPU for a long time!
Cons
- There is none of them.
Pros
- The processor is super: speed, performance in quiet mode, all modern specifications! Cold strong stone)
Cons
- I would like a lower price
Pros
- not expensive, the game pulls without question, it heats up weakly.
Cons
- there are none . for the casual user
Pros
- Excellent performance, not high temperature, not high power consumption. Price-performance is one of the best.
Cons
- Did not reveal
Pros
- Overclocking potential, cold, fast.
Cons
- Haven't been found in three years. I knew what I was getting, so it's perfect for me.
Pros
- fast, cold, automatic overclocking if necessary using Turbo Boost technology from 3.4 to 3.8 GHz, built-in HD 2500 video, the ability to connect 2 monitors
Cons
- bad optimization for overclocking. but if we're not talking about the i5-3570k of course, the 3570 isn't designed for that
Pros
- 1. Performance. 2. Energy consumption.
Cons
- 1. Thermal paste under the cover reduces overclocking potential. 2. The price goes through the roof during a crisis.
