With the only drawback - weight, what else can be added? I shoot a video on it, so as for the photo, I don’ The four was good, not sure they'

The previous 70-200 2.8L IS of the first version was a favorite lens, but it was soapy at 2.8 The new version is sharp with 2,8 + a better stub + the minimum focusing distance has been improved by 20 Expensive, For more details, you can read the review on the page After several years of operation - a favorite lens for landscapes, Only fixed lenses are more interesting, which win on open apertures in the picture, but carrying a bunch of Zeiss with you is hard and not very fast .

Bought to replace 70-200 / 2.8L (without IS) The drawing of the new, for me, is inferior, The resolution, yes, is high, I also noticed a very incomprehensible thing, perhaps only I have this: for 5dm2 with this lens, if you put on any protective glass, When used with a native extender 1.4x II, I don’t have complete satisfaction with this lens, I have some kind of unstable one.

Chose between 135L and 70-200 2.8 live in China, the price here is $ 800 lower) 180mm f 2.8 it’s indistinguishable from 135L) 4 stops. 1/20 from hands to 200 no words, best zoom.

If I remember correctly, I bought this lens for myself back in 2022 if not to get rich, - simple, because "Marks" Advantages: as soon as I got acquainted with this lens, I'm not a professional and I can't get 100% glasses", the control panel is even better, but nothing will help disgusting optics, it will still “soap” I learned something, but after buying this lens, indulge in long exposures, It doesn't matter: I don't shoot sports, so I don' For "object", "architecture" and "landscape" it is

Too expensive, the various tabs and buttons on the capped lens are illegible. With this you don't even see the red dot on the lens for attaching the lens to the camera. For the money I am definitely not satisfied!

this is a great lens case (Canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS II) and I was surprised by the quality and size, it really fits perfectly. I really recommend this Caot lens to anyone who cares about their lens.

Overall I'm happy with this product but I think the stripes could be a bit wider overall as I feel some of them fit well but some of them don't cover the surface they are meant to cover.

It has really protected my lens for a few years now and is holding up great. I get more comments on the cover than when I shoot with a monster lens.

The protective cover does the job, but there are some minor flaws. The lens hood cover is not precisely tailored to the shape of the lens hood. There must be a hole in the lid for this. It is difficult to operate the controls on the lens through the hard plastic window.