Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 66
  • 5
    35
  • 4
    16
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    5
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

Departure on these wheels season 2022. Traveled mostly Hong Kong-Hong Kong region. But he also went to nearby regions. At a speed of 120 km / h, at the entrance to a large puddle on the highway, she behaved with dignity - it didn’t lead anywhere. I ran into large pits several times - I did not notice any damage. I definitely recommend it as a good working tire for spring-summer-autumn in city driving mode (I didn’t climb into frank off-road). Outlander, permanent four-wheel drive.

Pros
  • Handles wet and dry well Almost no noise
Cons
  • Didn't notice

235/60/17 Production - Poland, Auto Mercedes GLK Very soft rubber, comfortably passes pits, joints, holes . Good handling and excellent rolling. consumption decreased by 1-1.5 liters per 100 km . having changed into it from the winter Brigestone Blizzak, he was simply stunned at how comfortable the ride became . but there is one drawback - it's noise . I don't understand those who write that it is quiet! Even with excellent noise isolation in a Mercedes, a rumble is heard after 60 km / h…

Pros
  • Softness, rolling, handling, braking
Cons
  • Noisy after 60 km/h

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, will order more.

I took tires in size 215/65 R 16 after reading a large number of reviews, including on the forum of lovers of my car Toyota Sienna (American minivan), basically everyone praises, especially for durability (people drive 150 thousand each) Got pros: The car became noticeably softer to move over bumps, with a sharp acceleration it shows good directional stability, probably due to the reinforced cord, the noise in the cabin also did not become more than it was. With its cons: For some reason, it…

Made in France. Size 205/70 R15, it would seem that they are high and rolled due to the profile, but before the replacement, I drove for a week on the all-season Michelin 205/65, that is, with a similar profile, with a very similar tread pattern and hardness of the mixture. However, the difference is like heaven and earth, like an elephant and a zebra. That all-season is just sports tires next to Latitude. It became noticeably more difficult to move the steering wheel, there is no restoring…

Pros
  • Energy-intensive, low fuel consumption, comfort on a bad road, holds well, responds well to vigorous steering.
Cons
  • Exchange rate stability is not high, viscous steering. It does not roam in ruts, but it loads the steering wheel with a parasitic weight.

Took on Suzuki Grand Vitara 3 years ago. Manageability was satisfied. After 1 season of use, I sold the car along with tires. After I bought Prado on exactly the same rubber (but, 265 mm wide and after 2-3 seasons of operation)), the impression is completely opposite: the rubber was hard and threw along the ruts so that after a soft winter I didn’t want to change my shoes back terribly. However, it is impossible not to note the wear resistance - on the Prado, this model served season 4 or 5.…

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, keeps track well (with a wheel width of 225 mm!).
Cons
  • With a width of 265 mm and significant wear, on the next car, the impression of the same model is completely opposite: the rubber was hard and threw it strongly along the ruts.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Bought in 19 radius for cr-v. In general, lately I have been using either Hankook Ventus or Michelin. The second one started to be a little disappointing, and more often it depends on the country of the manufacturer. I take only Korean Hankook. They say it's also better not to take Chinese, but I haven't tried it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

For 5 years of use (HONDA CRV) no complaints. Great summer tires. Precisely summer, because they glide on ice. The wear rate is low, there is a defect on one wheel, and then in the last year - you need to do a wheel alignment / collapse, and that one would run through again. Stones sometimes get stuck in the tread, but either do not fly out until you pop it up, or not into the arches.

Pros
  • Excellent quality, low noise, reliable, branded manufacturer
Cons
  • Didn't find it.

I didn’t change the tires for 4.5 years, SERVANTIK crawled both in the snow and in the liquid, that the rubber left such a period of time satisfied, I will look after an analogue or newer 225/65/17-2022-2022 :(( Different pros: 95OOO km. Went in a complete set, operation - summer and winter, approached the wear indicators. the discs are intact, without scratches, I don’t know, maybe it’s not the merit of the rubber, but I often rubbed the curbs to the curbs. Its cons: It may be true with a rut,

I read a lot of reviews about this rubber, someone was delighted, and someone was completely disappointed. I'll write mine. First, I have tires made in Poland. 215/70 R16. bought completely new. As it turned out later, it is very important who exactly the manufacturer of rubber is, this affects its quality and explains such inconsistency in the reviews. There is no need to talk about any softness, the rubber is quite hard, and in order to be softer, you have to reduce the pressure to 2.1…

Pros
  • Well holds a wet road and the first snow, but only while new. Pretty quiet. Indifferent to the track.
Cons
  • Rapid wear. Rigid. The protector peels off.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Terrible product, not worth the money at all!

traveled 3 seasons. the first year of operation was not bad. on the second summer, on one of the tires, pieces of the tread began to fall off from the middle groove. for the third season, degradation began on all tires - the tread just falls off in pieces! traveled no more than 30,000 km, 95% on asphalt (Toyota Harrier). tire production country - Hungary. I expected better quality from a well-known brand. :(

Pros
  • - not expensive - soft tire - low noise level - good straight line stability
Cons
  • - braking properties even on dry pavement are below average - poor handling on dry and especially wet pavement

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting, I don't recommend it to anyone!

I repeat, this is just horror, not MICHELIN! I bought this kit exactly three months ago (MICHELIN Latitude Tour HP 235/55 R19 101V) new from an authorized dealer. Year of manufacture of rubber 2022 (beginning of the year), production Hungary. Lexus RX 450h car. Finally a new set! After 300 km, the car starts to shake, well, I think shrinkage! Food, about 800 km of run, balance again. I did it, immediately went to a straight section, everything was good. Within two or three days, the car starts…

Pros
  • Wear resistance (based on the previous, previously purchased kit). Soft. Good handling up to 120km/h.
Cons
  • Balanced it 9 times in three months. It's just awful, not MICHELIN!

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsuccessful purchase, I am disappointed.

I'll quote one review: It's even scary to think about the agony of those who praise these tires so much - what did they ride before? Even on a completely new asphalt, the car rides and trembles with a small shiver. Guard . here's Michelin for you ((( With its pros: Quieter than Yokohama Geolandar G95. The grip is good, after the almost bald Yokohama. Handles well in turns. With its cons: Rigid for Subaru Outback, all joints are felt on the road. I had to make pressure up to 2.0 already…

I got the tires along with the purchase of a Ford Explorer in 2022. That is, she stood on it regularly. As the dealer told me (and it was February outside) - it is all-weather, so don't worry. Actually, the whole snowy February and half-snowy March, I skated on it, albeit with extreme caution. There were no pretensions. Then, of course, I began to use it as a summer one. Nevertheless, I rode this winter season on a real Bridgestoun Blizzak winter Velcro and here the guys are heaven and earth…

Pros
  • Quality, durability, wear resistance.
Cons
  • In my opinion, a little noisy. Not for winter, of course, but it was not required of her.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, normal product.

215-70 R16 on an SUV with an "empty" weight of 1.8t The general feeling is like skating. Those who do not know how to drive - it is better not to try to accelerate to high speed. Next time I won't take it for sure. (ated 2022-10-13) Changed to Nokian 215/70 R16 Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV 100H Heaven and earth. I don’t know how correct it is to write about another product in reviews of one product, but if you are thinking about SUV tires, take Nokian Hakka Blue 2!

Pros
  • 1. Soft. Irregularities pass comfortably even if slightly pumped. 2. Quiet. The soundproofing in my car is so-so, but the tires are the latest source of noise. 3. They teach you to drive very carefully and prudently.
Cons
  • 1. In a rut on the Hong Kong Ring Road "chats". And at a pressure of 2.8 atm, and at a pressure of 2.0 atm. Very unpleasant! 2. Hydroplaning. "Floats" in small puddles (in the same track) at a speed of 80 km/h. 3. Dry braking is so-so. The car quickly goes into the "crunch" ABS. 4. When accelerating on the front wheel drive out of a turn (for example, when leaving the adjacent territory to the avenue), one wheel slips. You have to turn on 4x4 if you want to fit into a fast stream from the exit. 5. When driving at 190 km / h (I traveled around Germany), the feeling that the car is about to break, even on small bends of the ban.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

Departure for four seasons, 40 thousand km. approximately - wear is not more than 30%. Does not throw in a rut, hydroplaning is absent. On rolled primer as on asphalt. But! The M + S index (mud and snow) is true: it behaves well in frosts, but in the heat, on hot asphalt, the grip properties sharply lose. All summer in Hong Kong I drive like ice - it slows down badly, I get under way with slipping. Once I even came to the rear bumper of the VAZ 2110, it was polished. I would not call it…

Pros
  • Wear-resistant, reliable.
Cons
  • Not for southern regions

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

Departure on these tires (Honda CR-V III, manual transmission) for more than 60 thousand km. (from Hong Kong to the Black Sea and to the Urals). Worn almost to zero. There were never any punctures (!). On long trips, a loaded car (and good gasoline) consumption is 7.0-8.0 (depending on driving style and speed limit). I wanted to switch to ContiPremiumContact-5 (-2) after the wear of this rubber. I had experience with this rubber on other cars. But Continental does not have dimensions 225|65…

Pros
  • Very good handling on dry pavement. Sufficient hydroplaning resistance. Quiet. Well balanced. With a loss of tire pressure, you may not even notice such a moment - i. E. reinforced sidewall.
Cons
  • There is a "rutting" when it hits one . At a speed of more than 100-110 km / h (and especially in the rain), it can be thrown out of it. Recommendations - hold the steering wheel firmly in your hands, get out of the rut at small angles. Rubber is not for mud and mud. I don’t consider the sticking of small stones in the tread to be a disadvantage, but the realities of this tread pattern (small sipes).

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Didn't quite buy it well, had a little trouble using it.

I use this brand not for the first time, but this particular model really disappointed me. I took 215 \ 65 R16 for tucson. Made in France. Drove 23,000 km on it. Driving style mixed, mostly in the city. The result is an almost bald court, and in general it is not clear to me that it exfoliates. As a result, on one wheel, (what was behind) simply tore out part of the tread. Landfill rubber. In those cases when I had to go to the ground, the road holds disgustingly, very little dirt and that's it

Pros
  • didn't notice
Cons
  • full