With its pros. : The zoom for such a price is impressive, I don’t consider 4AA batteries a disadvantage (they are also rechargeable), the photo quality is good, very convenient. Its cons: the cover on the battery compartment does not really inspire confidence! but I've been using it for 3 months now.

Has some pros Of the advantages, I was impressed by the design, a good display . perhaps these are all its advantages)) Cons: HORRIBLE BRAKE . the quality of the photo was also not impressive

Has pros: A compact model for everything that was put into it, a small flash, in good light. With its cons. There is no mode dial, the shutter button slows down a little, but this is not tragic, you just need to focus on the subject being photographed.

There are not a lot of other pseudo-reflex cameras available on the market that are in the same price range as this one and that might potentially compete with it in terms of a set of characteristics. Contains a few positive aspects Uses up batteries in a cost-effective manner. Wonderful examples of macro photography. Excellent dynamic range of semitones as well as excellent sensitivity of the matrix. First and foremost, a high-quality wide-angle lens with which all the essential elements can…

In general, I feel that the equipment is worth the price that I paid for it. Has pros: 1) The first benefit, which cannot be denied, is the incredible 26x zoom. It was feasible to fire at targets located more than one kilometer away. Everything is sharp, and the overall image quality is above and beyond what I expected. My prior "soap dishes" made it nearly hard for me to utilize digital zoom, but I discovered for the first time that it did not degrade the quality of the image when I zoomed in.

Even the most basic model does not have any manual controls or settings of any kind. The only option available to the user is to either shoot in the scene predetermined by the manufacturer or to hand control of the process over to the machine. The emphasis is the most significant drawback. It is almost a waste of time to shoot at the maximum zoom; the results will be significantly improved by using a zoom level that is closer to the average. It's hilarious that he writes the script for the…

In general, the camera is good! If you bought it for the purpose of shooting kids, in general, everything that moves, then the device will disappoint you! It takes too long to focus, the frames are blurry! But if you need it to photograph nature, take macro shots, then you won’t regret it, in this regard, everything is fine with it! The photos are clear, bright, the color and the image itself are not distorted. You need to adapt to it, look through all the modes, understand which mode is worth…

There are no manual settings that even the cheapest soap dish has. The user has only the opportunity either to choose the shooting scene set by the manufacturer or to entrust it to the machine. The biggest downside is the focus. It is almost useless to shoot at the maximum zoom - the result will be better with an average zoom with an increase in PC. It's funny that he writes the video at the maximum zoom quite decently, although it slows down. The impression that the device does not stop…

The first experience with Nikon, there were different soap dishes, a Canon 1100 SLR, I’m not new to photography. The main problem is that the camera is useless. It is heavy and slow for a soap dish, and the quality of the pictures is even worse. I found only one application - a 6-year-old child learns to photograph dolls and bears from a tripod, they do not move. PS. I tried other similar Nikon, the problem is the same.

Gave. But still, I look the horse in the mouth. Before that, there was an old Cannon Power Shot SX1S (crashed). I compare with him. Nikon slows down, just annoying. While collecting his thoughts - the child has already posed and ran away. Photos are often smeared, it becomes a little darker - there is already graininess in the pictures. The zoom is good, if you really try, you can shoot something good, but . you have to try sooo hard. Even if not by 26 (how can he), but by 12 (again, a…

The first day I was very happy with the purchase, until I uploaded the photo to the computer, who loves processed photos, but doesn’t know how to do it himself, you might like it, who needs it as natural and bright as possible, don’t even think about buying. I was led by the positive reviews (although the first three negative ones turned out to be more true than the more than 10 subsequent good ones). I am not a professional, I do not have excessive requirements for shooting, and even then I am

In general, for ⩽7500. (I don’t see any reason to pay more for this device) - a good camera. For beginners and those who do not like or do not want to mess with the settings - that's it. Pros: 26X zoom, 16 megapixels, good optical stabilizer, price (if you look for cheaper and not overpay), AA batteries, pretty good quality of the resulting pictures and videos under good shooting conditions. Cons: In difficult shooting conditions, there is a catastrophic lack of manual mode, a flimsy battery…

I bought this used camera because my son broke the lens of an old casio soap box. It's still scary to buy a DSLR - the children still stumble. Such a new one, it cost about 10 thousand (not currently on sale), which, I think, is very expensive for a camera of this quality. With DSLRs, such as Canon 650d, it makes no sense to compare, but with soap dishes on a par, even a little better. An ordinary camera, quite suitable for the money, if you buy a used one.

Summarizing the above Brakes at startup, unpleasant, sometimes, but a trifle. But the presence of built-in memory and, as a result, saving in the background, allows you to take 5-6 shots, while devices without memory due to the loss of time for processing and saving - only 2-3. A lot of preset modes, and only in automatic you can do the same color correction, but the device is not positioned as a professional one, and for amateur shooting there are a lot of manual settings and nothing…

Got pros: A simple fotik, like cowards. However, it is quite functional. Very good optical zoom, excellent macro photography. Able to take a series of shots with an interval of 1.2 seconds. Good presets. If you learn how to use them, then you can take a picture everywhere, even in a cave without a flash. In general, a very good soap dish for lovers. Very comfortable in the hand. Runs on AA batteries for quite a long time (4 pcs.) About two days of continuous shooting. On batteries, 1.5 times le

Fashionable three-dimensional camera, easy to use. Economically more expensive than soap dishes due to 4 batteries (accumulators). In a word, the camera is purely for an amateur. Like it, take it. Remember that it is difficult to work with a good SLR camera, and in automatic shooting, pictures often do not differ from soap dishes. I use this device for hiking, macro photography, where no hurry is required. Very satisfied . For this I give 5.

I have been using this device for over a year. I love to dig and tweak, but on this model it's not possible at all. To take a normal picture in the evening, you can set the mode for two hours. Photos are good only in daylight, macro photography is also good. Photos are not sharp, but as if in noise. If you use a flash, the charge will sit down for 20 shots. I'm 13 and this is just my opinion, I don't recommend this model to anyone, it's better to save some money and buy a normal SLR camera.

Conclusion. Disappointment. I've been photographing them for a year, verified. I am a person with a claim to quality, but it’s a pity for money for a mirror and I don’t want to carry it around (very overall). 6 thousand spent is not very pitiful, after all, experience. But I won't buy another Nikon. compromise model. The only big plus is a huge zoom, but again - only for good lighting and without demanding color reproduction.

For some who wrote negative reviews here, I would like to remind you that this is still a soap dish, and not a professional device, and that you are comparing the incomparable. In his class, I think he is even very good. Some pros: Good soap dish. Very convenient and understandable. For lovers, a very convenient menu with tips. Good macro shots. Kind of "greyhound" - under the mirror. Holds a charge for a long time, even on simple batteries. With its cons. Basically a little. Slightly slows…

For your money just super! You can take a picture of a bird from the window, and the whole table with guests, and you will fit with the house =). I advise you to buy, after a simple soap dish - it's a miracle! Has pros: -Zoom -Price -Photo quality -Design -Ergonomics, everything in its place -Batteries, simple lithium batteries 300 photos pull easily. -Wide angle, no need to ask to sit tighter or step back. - Nice flash. Some cons: -Lens noise when shooting video. - Slow, sometimes he…