Smart watch SUUNTO Spartan Trainer wrist HR, ocean Review
18
·
Average
Media
Photos by authors
Description of Smart watch SUUNTO Spartan Trainer wrist HR, ocean
- A good watch for the money if it had not fallen apart immediately after the warranty expired.
- Broke right after the warranty expired.
- Price Informative! vibro Ability to connect multiple sensors Navigation No touch display
- Built-in heart rate monitor (it could have been even cheaper without it). Autonomy is the lowest in the series.
- Lightweight, comfortable, tracks track and pace well.
- The inertia of the optical heart rate monitor. After 9 months of use, the strap lugs suddenly broke right on the wrist.
- Useless for the pool. I bought it solely for the sake of it. As a result, I think it's disgusting. At 500, losses are 75-125 meters. Types of navigation sometimes do not distinguish at all. Wrote in support, no response, no greetings. At least they wrote, but we are working to improve. During these months I was abroad twice. Suunto is worn by border guards in Finland and Austria. It's also useless in open water. Draws curves
- OK for running
- Virtually useless for the pool.
- 1) Light 2) Good functionality at a fairly low price 3) They work for a long time without recharging - the declared 14 days, including 4-5 2-hour workouts during this time, can withstand without problems.
- - Size. Relative to my previous Ambit 2S, they are noticeably smaller. I have small wrists, so it’s more convenient for me to walk with them every day than with the same embits. - Color screen. This is both a plus and a minus. For the colors were not next to the pictures that stores usually post. The colors are very pale. But the very fact that they exist is still a plus.
- - Heart rate monitor. To say that the optical heart rate monitor is lying is to compliment him. He doesn't just lie by 10-15%, as I might expect. He draws data from the astral plane. I went up the hill with a length of 150 meters, I decided to measure the pulse. 110, the watch confidently told me. After 5 minutes, I was walking on a flat road and they already told me that my heart rate was 170. In short sprints, they sometimes say that my heart rate reaches 210, despite the fact that on the chest strap I have never seen a heart rate above 195. When I first bought them, during training I checked the accuracy of the data on the Ambit2S from the belt and on the Spartans from the optical sensor. For 75-80 minutes of training, the Spartans showed 10 strokes higher. There were times when Ambit showed a pulse of 120, and Spartans - 180. The same parsley was today, when after a warm-up he stood, and the pulse showed - 155. While jogging, I measured on the carotid artery - 140, by the clock - 185. In short, With this heart rate monitor, it is impossible to determine the pulse, even the pulse zones. He can easily lie for 40-50 punches. If you can understand from the schedule from the chest strap how many intervals a person ran, it is clearly visible there when the pulse rises, when it falls, on the optics - a solid mess. It is worth noting that this is not the problem of this watch. I heard similar reviews from the owners of Garmin Fenix 5. - For watches that in the 2022 officially cost from 20k, they look like a children's Chinese watch for 300. True, I compared them with Ambit3S, the material is the same.
- Customization of what is displayed on the display during training, water protection, many training modes.
- In comments