Webcam Defender G-lens 2597 HD720p, black Review

1. The attached photos were taken in artificial and daylight from two cameras (with a lowered mask - this is a built-in 0.9 MP laptop camera). For this camera, a resolution of 2.1 megapixels (1920 * 1080) was additionally used - find the difference ((. 2. This product has already been returned, because. in the box was a Market package from another buyer - for sealing

Completely satisfied. I bought one camera first for home use, and then, after testing, after 3 months I bought a second one for work. Pros below: A high-quality webcam with an honest declared HD resolution, really working autofocus, does not require any installation programs and drivers to connect - plug it into USB and forget it. Works with all programs that require a webcam. For a price of 2,250. it is better not to find it in principle. With its cons: Short wire. But this is solved by buying

Many do not like the quality in this camera, the built-in microphone, and so on. I will say right away that buying a camera as a microphone is a perversion, I do not understand such people. The quality of the camera is good, autofocus works fine.

If you use the microphone built into the camera, then any change in the position of the head will be accompanied by tapping and creaking due to refocusing of the lens. The user will hardly notice this, but the subscribers hear it louder than the voice

1. The video needs to be set up once (I did it via Skype), so that later I don’t have to remember about the settings anymore. I didn't really like the automatic ones. It seemed that they were somehow trying to adapt to the moment, but I don’t need it 2. Microphone - as with all cameras, it requires adjustment. Already wrote that it is necessary to configure via Skype. And this is true, otherwise it catches everything - both the knock on the keyboard and extraneous sounds. Adjust the…

I stopped being satisfied with a cheap webcam, and I just wanted a better, more detailed picture. More expensive models, of course, provide this, but too high prices can not afford. An Internet search showed a huge selection of webcams. With its pros. Based on the desired characteristics of the webcam and its cost, I chose this model, stylish in appearance, harmoniously looks on the monitor. The quality of the picture for a relatively small price is completely satisfied, a wide viewing angle…

Overall a good camera. However, there are better and cheaper ones. The image quality itself is at the level of many 0.3MP cameras, but there is less noise than very cheap ones, and auto-correction works very well (exposure, white balance, focus). So if you need a "set and forget" camera and you don't want to dig the Internet in search of an inexpensive high-quality camera, then this one will do, and a thousand is not such a big amount. And what about the HD 720 - they, of course, did not smell…

it's time to change your webcam to something more reasonable. the choice fell on this defender because of the price + good reviews. At the moment, the feelings are mixed, because: 1) the picture is quite clear when talking, but there is absolutely no autofocus. constantly trying to focus, though it is not clear what exactly. like the face of the interlocutor (bought for parents) is almost always at the same distance, but the focus stubbornly does not understand this. 2) in addition to point…

enough to talk on Skype, the microphone is excellent, the video quality is also excellent. A very clear image is obtained using this camera, I also installed the software recommended by the manufacturer, dabbled with the settings, for those who understand this is a very interesting model. Different pros: it has autofocus, can be attached to any surface, has a built-in microphone Got cons: it was possible to make the wire a little more authentic, and so everything is normal for me

It's high time you upgraded to a webcam that's more suitable for everyday use. This defender was selected as the winner due to the favorable price and customer reviews. At this time, there is a confusion of emotions due to the following reasons: 1) The picture is very clear when the person is talking, but there is no autofocus at all. always making an effort to focus, though it is unclear on what exactly this entails. as the face of the interlocutor, which was purchased for the parents, is…

I took it for 2022. If the camera was not needed for work, then I would wait for the hype to decrease in the hope of taking the best model for the same money Has some pros Ordinary camera. Suitable for skype, zoom and more. The sound is normal, colleagues did not complain. Installation is simple, plugged into the computer and that's it. Fixed on a thin monitor without problems Cons below: Autofocus seems to be there, but it's better to turn it off immediately. I pointed the camera at the wall…

After installing the driver from the manufacturer's website, for the first few days it showed P720, 10 frames / sec, which was frustrating, because the package says otherwise. Three days later, the driver began to show P720, 30 frames / sec. I do not know what this is connected with, I did not check with third-party programs. Some image artifacts are present, especially under artificial lighting, but they do not bother me. The autofocus can get a bit silly, suddenly realigning itself when I'm…

If it is not possible to take more expensive from the following models: Logitech Webcam Pro 9000 Logitech B910 HD Logitech C910 HD Logitech C920 HD , then feel free to take Defender G-lens 2597 HD720p - that's it! ATTENTION - I consider my opinions to be subjective, because there was no possibility of testing with other models of webcams. Has pros: Quality picture :) Auto focus and other func. :) Fastening :) missing indicator :| Worth the money ($30) :) Cons below: Software - in the…

I was looking for a camera with autofocus and a resolution of at least HD, with such parameters this model is the best, I am 100% satisfied with the purchase. The PRICE is simply not comparable with analogues, for such a price you can forgive the camera for all the shortcomings with a calm soul. Its pros: Clear picture, honest HD 720p. In automatic mode, it adapts well to the lighting (even in the dark, a fairly good picture is obtained). Good clear sound, no buzzing, no phoning, no noise…

Picture 720p - here everything is as stated. The camera is quite bulky, which, combined with the standard mount and relatively thin monitor frame (1cm), covers part of the screen. You can work a little and solve this problem, but we are no longer talking about reliable fastening. The absence of an LED indicator is not fatal, but still not pleasant. Solved by software. Bottom line: at half price, such a purchase already makes sense

I was seeking for a camera with autofocus and a resolution of at least HD, with such characteristics this model is the best, I am 100% delighted with the purchase. The PRICE is just not comparable with counterparts; at such a price, you can forgive the camera for all of its inadequacies with a peaceful soul and have peace of mind. The picture is crisp and it is presented in 720p HD honestly. When set to automatic, it responds effectively to changes in lighting (even in the dark, a fairly good…

- in the reviews, dissatisfaction due to the lack of software / buttons - I personally am monopenisual. It turns on when you programmatically press the video chat, it is configured automatically, "cheap-angry" - in the dark, the kid is furious, but again, the camera of the Deshman price range was not taken for filming the Truman Show and Sasha Gray. - a clip for mounting on a monitor, or rather its absence. You may be slipping, so get some tape/parallel/glue/paper clip/hammer/puncher/welder…

What is called "sit down and go." Firewood was not required. Fixture - the rubberized wire bracket. You can bend as you like, choosing the optimal shape for any LCD monitor. Nice undocumented feature: on a Mac (MacOSX 10.7.5) Skype saw the camera without drivers. In addition, the sound from the microphone is fed to the computer via USB, and not to the analog 3.5 mm input. For those of you who don't know, Macs don't have standard mic analog inputs. So microphone signal via USB is the only…

Image quality for this money is very good. It is clear that at the previous rate, for this money it was possible to buy a camera twice as good. So don't expect anything great from her.

The camera is very sensitive to movement in the frame, moved a little - and autofocus starts working, it probably works for 2/3 of a second, at which time the sound from the microphone deteriorates, then after a second movement again - and in a circle. After working a little, I realized that a hardware indicator of camera activity is still needed, it is not here, and I did not find the software one, which is mentioned in another review. This camera was bought for work, I think I won’t buy one