🚴 High-Density, High-Elasticity, and Highly Breathable 4D Gel Padded Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts Review

Recently I've been turning fairly regularly and I've been having problems with the saddle. I bought these shorts and a pair from another brand and they are my favorites. They fit well and are very comfortable. I tried to buy my wife the same ones, but the women's options turned out to be completely different. I chose a different color but the result is a completely different style (the waistband wasn't elastic). I returned them for another pair which were mistakenly labeled as a women's band…

Fits well. I've worn them for about half a dozen rides and they haven't slipped, pinched etc. The sizing chart was accurate for me too. The most important thing is the feed. It's thick and huge, and while it does its job well in the areas it needs most (where the two corners of the femur touch the saddle), it also offers ample padding in other areas unaffected by cycling. The result is a feeling that you are wearing diapers or something similar. I compared the padding to my Novara shorts - they

I've given them three stars, which seems generous to me. The shorts look great, are very breathable and pad your buttocks well on the bike. That's why I gave them a three. However, the material they are made of is stretchy enough that it takes some work to get them to fit properly. I can practically pull the belt up to my armpits. Also, the padding is terribly thick and stiff (even after months of use), making it difficult to properly position it on the buttocks. Once they're on, they start…

First, good news. Fit according to size/weight chart. I'm 6'0" and I'm 185 and the Large fits me well. I have skinny legs so they won't stay down and I need to get them back because of that. I use them with a unicycle so I need legs that are down stay on so I don't rub the seat. The lining seems fine but I haven't tried it on a bike or unicycle as I plan to return. These are not cycling shorts. They are very light and stretchy and are cycling underwear ( as advertised). The waistband is…

I bought these XGC shorts to complement the Baleaf version to see which fit better, have better padding and perform better. At the moment XGC fits better (for my skinny legs). The XGC's leg holes wrap tighter around my thighs than the Baleaf. The fabric is more like mesh, which makes it clearer that these are probably not separate cycling shorts. That being said, I don't think it "radiated" anything if you were caught wearing them alone while out for a walk on a hot summer day. The padding is…

I bought 3 pairs to test the new Peloton. I haven't ridden in years so I needed something with padding to break my body in. I was concerned about the price as they seemed cheap but so far the shorts have worked well. I had to take size XL and the nude shorts fit just right. There isn't really much room in the gel pad area and at first I thought it would curl up a bit and become uncomfortable, but it didn't. After I ride it takes up space on the block but doesn't get lost. Def is not a problem…

To start this review, you should understand that I don't need 9 inch padded cycling shorts for my peleton training. I'm not going to run the Tour de France or the Vuelta a España with 21 legs or 18 legs respectively, I ride my Pelton, ride a stationary bike and run miles! The short XGC is about 6 inches long, which is perfect for me. All I need is a pair of cycling shorts! And I don't wear it as underwear. I wear them as cycling shorts. I just completed a 180 mile ride on a Peleton exercise…