Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 315
  • 5
    174
  • 4
    67
  • 3
    33
  • 2
    21
  • 1
    20

Type of review

There are many spikes, the tread is bold. Snow is definitely her element. Another strange thing: you slow down sharply - it does not slip. You accelerate sharply - it slips. Probably due to the fact that the spikes are directional. Well, good :) I advise. Good luck on the roads. Got pros: 195/55/15r Put the tires on while the weather was still dry. On the pavement behaves with dignity, on wet roads too. The spikes are strong: I went back and forth to Belarus - they didn’t wiggle, they hold…

Auto - Kia Sead station wagon 2022. There hasn't been deep snow yet, I drove on ice, in snowfall and on asphalt. In general, the rubber is well balanced. I recommend. Different pros: Good on pavement and ice, deep snow has not yet ridden. ABS doesn't intervene at all. Excellent directional stability up to 140 km / h (205/55 R16), I haven’t tried it higher, someone’s car is scouring at speed - repair it. Puddles within a reasonable depth passes without noticing. The noise is below average, at…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Didn't quite buy it well, had a little trouble using it.

In short, such rubber is definitely not for a small car . I saw it a lot on expensive crossovers . Even if you move on asphalt 90% of the time in winter, it’s better to look at another option, but if you have a country house and quite a lot of winter country roads, then the choice is obvious. By the way, it’s just a fairy tale on the packed snow . and the silence and keeps excellent (as long as there are spikes) =) by the end of the 3rd season (with fairly aggressive winter driving) -80-90% of…

Pros
  • Rowing wildly! Loose snow, porridge, without problems, drove north on this rubber (Kogalym, Gubkinsky, Hong Kong) Golf 6
Cons
  • Wildly noisy on the pavement . Despite the fact that the Shumka in Golf is at the level and yet, I don’t know mb purely my subjective opinion, the tread on the rubber transverse to the movement is located very far apart, like on tractor tires, and with slow movement 20-30 km / h there is a slight vibration from the rubber (before that, I skated Hakku 7 did not notice this) .

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

Absolutely satisfied with the tires. I took a year ago a set of 215/55/17 for a Camry V50 at a price of 7400 per tire. Rubber is not much inferior to Michelin or Hakka, the price tag for which started from 10-11 thousand apiece. I can especially distinguish a slight rubber noise, confident braking, especially on ice - due to the considerable length of the spikes (photo 4), it clings to the ice like claws. At the same time, the spikes are strong, they do not fly out, as on some Gislaved. Some…

Pros
  • Excellent road holding. Moderately noisy. Strong spikes. Because of the long spikes, it clings well on ice. Inexpensive compared to competitors of similar quality.
Cons
  • Slightly soft side. One tire caught either left, or defective.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and the quality are both ok.

Size 205/55/16. Octavia 3 ,1.8T-DSG. Rubber for rear-wheel drive-all-wheel drive heavy vehicles (BMW, Merc, Audi, etc.) It slows down and keeps the trajectory at 5+, slips during acceleration. I would recommend to the regions! Very good on well-worn snow, ice and powder. The city is noisy and tearing through the asphalt (slows down, wet-dry 5+) For porridge on the track (with my auto parameters) speed above 100-110km / h is fatal)) floats . but predictably Do not buy for light front-wheel…

Pros
  • Good brakes
Cons
  • Noisy (buzzing) at first

Rubber pleased, I put it on the second car. At first I was on a rear-wheel drive car (bmw 118i). Never stuck in never cleaned yards. A couple of times pulled off (more on this below) the car across the frozen track, but got out on his own. Due to the characteristics of the tread pattern, it is extremely "slippery" in side drifts. Pulls out for sure. But it rolls well forward. When you try to drive between the ruts on ice in winter, you should immediately prepare for the fact that you will swim…

Pros
  • patency Strong sidewall Thorns are firmly seated
Cons
  • Pulls out with a little more vigorous cornering and when driving on ice on ruts.

Decided to add a review. Now I ride Ice Arctic on a Lancer 9 in size 195/60 r15. Nexia continues to ride sister. For three seasons, I never doubted my choice. Quite stable and predictable on all surfaces. It's not scary on winter asphalt. He is not afraid of snowdrifts and snow porridge, he had to fly out onto an uncleaned roadside from a fool in an oncoming lane - he taxied without consequences, except for shaking his pants out into the bushes :-). Tested at -47 on the track (January 10…

Pros
  • - handling (does not get scared on any surface) - reliability (strong, spikes lose moderately)
Cons
  • - noisy

Why Goodyear Ice Arctic? Because earlier the 500th UGs were on the car (which is important - Hergeshtellt in Deutschland), they drove great, but everything comes to an end, so I decided to choose also a directional pattern from the same manufacturer. Auto - Mitsubishi Carisma, 1.6 for 103 l / s. Front wheel drive, weight 1500 +\-. Wheels chose 195 \ 65 \ 15. I can change the tires in the very snow, because there is more than one car in the family, I leave it for dessert)) I bought it at the end

Pros
  • Working on ice (when the spikes are in place) tractor properties on snow (both with and without studs), but slightly worse than UG500 wear resistance Good balance
Cons
  • The most active loss of spikes even under the condition of running. Like Velcro and on ice - cow format on the same ice Sudden hernia out of the blue Maid in Poland

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, Im glad I found this product.

195/55 R15 on the Lacetti. Not afraid of snow lines and ruts (here they wrote). In both cases, predictable behavior for me. Not a racer, but I like a quick start (on asphalt without slipping). Braking, if not emergency, is always smooth. At the same time, the spikes are all in place for 2 seasons. Subjectively, for me it is better than the previous Pirelli, but also more expensive of course.

Pros
  • Excellent tires, predictable behavior on any surface. Season 2 - spikes in place. Surely somewhere they flew out on 4 wheels, but you have to look, you can’t see it right off the bat. I think 95%, no less.
Cons
  • Noise is its main drawback. The previous Pirelli Winter Carving, although not quiet, is subjectively quieter. The second disadvantage is the price.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

Bought for Peugeot 407 SW in dimension 215/60 R16. During the winter of 2022-2022, tires have seen snow and ice, dry and wet asphalt, snow-covered primer and other pits. As many people here write about the sidewall, I don’t know, I applied it several times - nothing to her, she survived. In general, it holds the road well, it is not afraid of puddles, like the summer one (I have Michelin). Rowing in the snow is simply gorgeous, despite the fact that I don’t have a jeep or a crossover, I…

Pros
  • price, quality, road behavior
Cons
  • not yet found

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Does not meet my expectations, it was not worth buying.

I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS TIRE TO ANYONE! I didn’t have to change what I tested myself and time (Nokian hap). When I sold the previous car, I gave it away on winter tires. There would be enough rubber for a few more seasons and 80% of spikes remained there ! Some pros: After buying a new car, I was faced with the choice of winter tires. Taking into account frequent trips to the countryside, the rubber should be passable, it should keep the car well on a slippery road, in winter porridge and…

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I will never repeat this purchase.

I don't recommend tires! I bought it and regretted it 10 times! Miser pays twice! The cord is constantly torn (about 8 holes in two seasons, consider for yourself how much it costs to brew a wheel and the amount of time spent). Rubber does not like snow, stuck several times in a harmless situation. At a speed of 120, the car starts to feel insecure on the road ! Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice Arctic 225/45 R17 94T `Mercedes C180

Pros
  • The only advantage - No noise
Cons
  • 1. Weak line 2. Does not like snow 3. Floats after 120 km

Kalina, 185/65/14, made in Poland, I drive for the 5th season. Most of the native studs flew out, but before each season I carry out additional studding. On a snowy road, he rows snow porridge as it should, he drove where other cars got stuck. On heated tires and ice keeps, and braking is normal. But side slip (especially on ice) is present. When turning 90 degrees at a speed of 30-40 km / h, the rear of the car shifts. I'm used to and always expect it. Tire wear is minimal. Today I will again…

Pros
  • Rowing in any snow porridge
Cons
  • Does not hold side slip, even at 30 km / h when entering a turn, brings the rear axle.

Size 195\65\15 Yes, the spikes fly out. But not critical. In the first year, I lost 4-5 spikes from the driving wheels. There were moments when I had to abruptly jump out to the main one, with a slip on the asphalt. The rear are all intact. Departure of the 4th season. Shipov lost about a dozen for each leader, but there are still plenty of them. Regarding the soft sides: I flew into the pits and into the curbs, everything is intact. Since they tear it in other reviews, where is the guarantee…

Pros
  • I confirm all the advantages listed in other reviews.
Cons
  • No.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

I bought it at a price of 3220 / piece in November 2022, changed shoes closer to December, and now the first snow and frost, we have a holiday on the roads as usual - April Fool's Day on the roads - a lot of accidents, traffic jams. So this tire impressed me very positively. I had the experience of riding a Medved, Medeo, well, some of our brands, and so this rubber is a qualitatively new breakthrough, you feel like the "king of the road" when everyone is barely moving everywhere or just afraid

Pros
  • Reliable grip (ice, snow, in minus and during thaw), leads well on dry asphalt (compared to other studded tires)
Cons
  • Increased noise (for studded this is the norm)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

What you need, a cool purchase, I advise you.

I bought it in the fall of 2022, to replace the Goodyear Ultra Grip 500, which I drove 4 years (4 seasons) 40,000 km. car Honda Fit 2022. I described the pros above, minus of course the noise on the pavement at speeds of more than 100 km / h, but the noise is compensated by excellent cross-country ability and handling. Today, 04/19/2022, I changed my shoes for the summer, looked at winter tires for 8,000 km. flew 6 spikes and only on the front, rear as new.

Pros
  • patency; Large spikes; The softness of rubber.
Cons
  • Noise on asphalt.

Negative reviews are not clear, maybe people ran into a fake. Rubber saved on rolled snow at a speed of> 120 km / h. I used to be on a rear-wheel drive car, it’s a pleasure to drive it, I haven’t seen better rubber. Improved stud, lost 3 studs from four wheels during the season. Mode of use: city - highway - quite a bit in the countryside. On any surface allows you to fully control the machine. Noisy at first, after running it gets quieter. Now moved to the front-wheel drive, ordered the same.

Pros
  • Rows on all types of coverage: snow, ice, porridge, etc. The spikes hold up well.
Cons
  • The first time is noisy on asphalt.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Bought these tires in size 205/55/16. What I want to say right away, the noise at first was like on an airplane, so I think many people have new tires. Audi a4 b7 car made Shumka. Even with Shumkov it was noisy, the car was driven like a bus (it floated on asphalt). Advice or any abrupt rebuilding abrupt starts up to 400 km run! After the spikes rolled somewhere around 300 km, I drove on this rubber and it has already become much better! Firstly, the noise went away; secondly, the…

Pros
  • Management, grip, price, brutal look :)
Cons
  • Haven't found it yet!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, a great item for everyone!

Ideal for snowy roads and ice. I can't find words of admiration to adequately describe the pleasure of driving on this rubber. Excellent brakes on ice, lateral support when cornering and maneuvering at height. Throughout the winter, I never got stuck anywhere. Minus only on dry pavement - quite noisy (possibly due to the low sound insulation of my car Mitsubishi Lancer 9 2022 release.)

Pros
  • perfect road grip soft
Cons
  • noisy on dry pavement

traveled one season, dashed off, about 10,000, no loss of spikes, average noise, at least quieter than my previous ones, Ice Zero, they rattled as if doomsday was close. they don’t lose elasticity, although the lowest temperature that I found was -25, they hold the road perfectly on ice and snow, even when they had to drive, they didn’t lose the road significantly, well, the tread is not particularly visible to wear off much, 90 percent satisfied with the first season

Pros
  • reliability, silence, elasticity
Cons
  • until I saw