Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
maxxis bravo at-771 215/65 r16 98t summer logo

MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer Review

23

·

Very good

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.1
Automotive, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories, 🚙 Car Covers, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(6)
img 1 attached to MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer
img 2 attached to MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer
img 3 attached to MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer
img 4 attached to MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer

Photos by authors

(2)
img 7 attached to MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer
img 8 attached to MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer

Description of MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 215/65 R16 98T summer

The Maxxis AT-771 Bravo tire is an all-weather tire designed for 4WD applications. It has a fairly large, aggressive tread, which is specially designed for off-road use. It must be installed on real SUVs with a 4x4 wheel arrangement, whose owners often like to move off the asphalt and do this in any weather or season. The tread pattern features variable pitch blocks to reduce noise, while four U-grooves and shoulder lugs increase resistance to scuba diving. Specially selected wide grooves between massive blocks provide fast self-cleaning on snow and loose ground, especially when slipping. The shoulder “toothy” zone provides confident maneuvering on muddy dirt roads. Specially reinforced durable carcass, woven from nylon threads, allows it to withstand hard hits when riding at high speed off-road. The use of special addons

Reviews

Global ratings 23
  • 5
    13
  • 4
    4
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

I read the reviews and now I’m writing a review myself, the rubber is quiet, soft and smoth. Probably no worse than the Barguzin 4 × 4 will be which has been on the Niva since birth, I haven’t tried it yet. It balances well from 30 to 60 Georgians, 60 one wheel was, disk Not good

Pros
  • Soft, little noise from this class of rubber, beautiful.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

Rubber is decent, but recommended for drivers with decent experience due to the sharpness of reaction and instability in the rut (rut grooves on asphalt) With its pros: Low price, good tenacity both on asphalt (dry and wet) and on the ground. Soft. Low noise level. Cons below: Very sharp reaction to the actions of the wheel. Valkaya (it may be necessary to try to increase the pressure). Bad friends with the rut.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Low quality, I will not buy this anymore.

I cut the sidewall on the primer, and I observed after a kilometer or a kilometer and a half that this is a failure for the rubber, and the mileage of the wheel is 80 kilometers.

Pros
  • Price, tranquility, and gentleness
Cons
  • Poor sidewall construction; slides sideways in the mud.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

Both the 4runner (265/65/17) and the Rav4 (235/60/16) utilize these tires. Previously, the 4runner had the Michelin Latitude Cross AT and the Rava had the Bridgestone AT967. Therefore, a comparative description will be given. Michelin had no clue what was getting so much acclaim. She doesn't have any off-road gear besides tires with a specific tread pattern. Highway-style side walls. It seems that I caught a branch in the woods and didn't let go of it or anything; instead, it shattered in…

Pros
  • Comfort, silence, power, adaptability
Cons
  • There is literally zero room for complaint.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

I have no idea who says it's noisy; after my highway cormorants in the duster's cabin (where there is no noise anyway) it became noticeably quieter; at 130 mph there were no highway vibrations; it was balanced for rubber with a 70 profile; more than because the profile is higher and the tires are soft, the car started to swallow holes much better; generally speaking, everyone who owns one car for all occasions mostly travels within the city.

Pros
  • !She doesn't utter a sound!Soft!
Cons
  • They are not cheap, costing somewhat more than 7000 per bottle.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Medium quality, especially for that kind of money.

Rubber on top, infatuated. Size 215/65/16; delivered at the end of April. balance without any issues. I was able to test it out in the snow, on sand, and mud, and it rows incredibly well. After only a few thousand miles, I started to notice deterioration on the front wheels. Rear is fine. The collapse happened twice (! ), but the car is now in functioning order. Yes, and the entire area that came into contact with the road was worn. As a result, over 10,000 runs between May and August, at least

Pros
  • Rows, is quiet, grips the road astonishingly well (for A/T tires), gobbles up holes, and is very tough.
Cons
  • WEAR!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good and high-quality product, but there are disadvantages.

There was no more balanced alternative when I considered what to add to the Hoda HR-V in 2022, regardless of the cost or available features. It pulls normally through mud (naturally and without fanaticism), gravel, and asphalt; nothing is wrong, and wear wasn't apparent until after two or three seasons of use. I thus purchased the same pair of summer tires when the need arose. I advocate in general.

Pros
  • 1. Hankook, which offers AT rubber at the lowest price, is a third more expensive. 2. Normal quality, 6 seasons and approximately 60 thousand kilometers traveled; during the most recent season, cracks moved in a circle and a hernia crept out from under the cover on one wheel; the tread residue is around 3–4 mm. I purchased a fresh set of the same rubber so as not to tempt fate. 3. Although there is a spike for it, rubber only shown relative durability in mud (particularly up until the tread was worn out). 4. Stable and even. 5. Has nearly no noise on the track and is not susceptible to hydroplaning
Cons
  • I didn't point out any obvious flaws other than the fact that it was a touch heavy (after two years, the front wheels' wheel bearings buzzed, but the rear ones are still functional), but any ATshka is heavier than a typical summer one.

In the space of 22565p17, I equated it to 4. Replaced the Nokian green, which was previously only available for use on the highway and lost all traction when traveling at lower speeds. The low noise level was a big plus for Maxis, and the ride comfort and cornering traction on both dry and wet pavement were also high marks. Primers with wet clay are no longer an issue; I'm not sure if the rear-wheel drive was ever hooked up, but you can confidently guide the vehicle through any soil by turning…

Pros
  • Superior quality in every way possible.
Cons
  • Weak and unpredictably weak. tires can be used year-round, albeit they will wear out faster in the winter than in the summer.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

No joy in buying the product, it's not good.

I was drawn in by the cheap price and convinced by the glowing reviews that it is superior to popular brands like Goodyear, Henkuk, and Yokohama. Thus, I decided to purchase. I was only gone for a day before returning it to the shop because of the severe vibrations and uneven handling at above 110 kilometers per hour. Henkuk ATM 10 was switched to since it was superior in every way. It's possible that my bad luck was just random, but I'm done with Chinese roulette for good. The tires I used on…

Pros
  • Inexpensive and unobtrusive.
Cons
  • Badly balanced (two of the four are 170g and two are 140g), difficult to ride, and lacking in side grips.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

Despite the wear, I would suggest it without hesitation if the sidewall hadn't come loose. And so - maybe I can't stand it any longer - the cost of this Chinese product is now competitive with that of many other, more prestigious brands. No obvious benefits may be shown. The Japanese and the latest batch of Americans both catch my eye. Good luck! Listed below are some advantages: I have a 2005 Kia Sportage that I purchased used. Back then, it had the lowest price tag in the market. Good…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

225/60R17 tires were purchased for a Duster. It greatly depends on the quality of the road, and there was an immediate rumble from tires that filled the cabin. I had to completely soundproof the room, but this had little impact on the rumble itself. When compared to the MT rubber that was originally used in everyday off-road, it doesn't lose much ground, especially if you bleed up to 1 atm. It digs really well, so you don't even need more. It does not, of course, pull off-road, but it is…

Pros
  • In my circumstances (gravel and sand), it rows better than you could ever think. I appreciate how aggressive it seems, but it is soft in motion. Clearly engraved.
Cons
  • When the temperature is below 12 degrees, it has poor braking performance on wet pavement and readily slips into a turn. Noisy. dislikes ruts in my size, especially while overtaking at full force.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

Instead of eating grandtrekovskoy ATeshki in the summer, place them in rubber. I traveled the equator and then some to reach the Crimean peninsula. Stones, pebbles, sand, and clay from all around the world ended up in Crimea. It's perfect, and you don't have to worry about not driving somewhere (within reason). Due to inexperienced motorists, I've had to risk flying out into the gravel shoulder of the oncoming lane twice when traveling at around 120 km/h in order to safely overtake slower…

Pros
  • Riding and rowing in silence
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm impressed! Exactly the product deserves your attention.

In the early months of summer 1717, I acquired some brand-new rubber. Toyo Open Country and Kumho (or Hankuk) were my two options. Since the pattern was the same on maxis and they were less expensive, I went with the latter. Skating around 12,000 kilometers, including trips to the sea (around 4,000 kilometers total length, highway, stone-covered mountains, mountain rivers, passes), city, highway, woodland, and field. In terms of wear, I have nothing negative to report; the car's tread seems…

Pros
  • Cheap tires that perform exceptionally well and quietly.
Cons
  • Produced in China appears on the label.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Excellent tires for driving in the city as well as on hunting expeditions and for modest off-road use. I gave it a lot of thought before deciding whether or not to get AT because there were a lot of reports that contradicted each other. Since I drove Dunlop ST30 tires during the summer, I ultimately chose to switch to Maxxis 771. I will explain how I am feeling by saying: Even if it was traveling at 70 kilometers per hour on the side of the road and dropped in, nothing changes. The car did not…

Pros
  • Excellent tires, make sure you read the review.
Cons
  • There is no information on precise measurements, accurate to the millimeter, to determine whether or not the tire will fit into the arch.

I recently went out and purchased a maxis771 for myself. But I came to the conclusion that it should be shared, so I did the following: I performed a balancing check of 30.60 grams; I removed the wheels from a Chevrolet niva weighing 205.752022 grams; and I installed 7-inch wheels taken from a UAZ. The situation in the entire village was normal. On the sidewall, there is an inscription written in white characters that describes how pliable the rubber is. By the way, I didn't weigh it, but it…

Pros
  • It is not noisy, it keeps the road well both on wet and dry pavement, it climbs well in mud and snow, and the main advantage is that the price is not too awful. It is good at cleaning, it is not noisy, it keeps the road well both on wet and dry pavement, and it climbs well in mud and snow.
Cons
  • There are currently no negatives.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

As soon as this rubber emerged, I purchased tires for the prior vehicle because it was the least expensive Chinese rubber available from AT. Suspect the quality. During the procedure, doubts were removed. Excellent road holding, no highway noise on the pavement, and an excellent everyday. Do not compare MT AT! MT is MT and AT is AT. Only for pokatushek, not every day, on MT. If it were horrible, I wouldn't have purchased the identical tires for my parents. I cherished this tire a lot. I shifted

Pros
  • ATSHA 50 asphalt/50 soil - NOT NOISY! with outstanding AT patency. Off-road movement is simple (don't confuse this with MT!).
Cons
  • No. Unless the cost increased after people tried it.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not exactly what I wanted, but basically everything is fine.

The first time my family and I went hunting in the mud in early April, I rolled it like they did on a salon's patriot model. We never took it off. I had to drive sideways through fierce mud, the mud was flying just horror on the roof on the hood, but I was driving 5 km/h, but I was driving! The mud had frozen in the morning so we could drive as if on dry ground, but when we returned, everything had melted and it was hell. rowing along the threshold in the muck is like standing on the tall…

Pros
  • rows, rides like a freeway on the paved surface, maintains a speed of 160 mph with ease.
Cons
  • wear, however it is up for debate, see below.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

I equipped discovery 3 with tires suitable for both paved roads and light off-roading, such as a muddy path through a field or a comb. This tune was made for the pavement. The silence was deafening. Completely avoids getting wet; in fact, it aced the puddle test! Increased speed from 80 to 130 on an empty m11 in an empirical attempt to avoid splashing across puddles. With a speed of 130 mph in the deluge, a regular four-wheel drive vehicle may be driven silently. For the most part, I avoided…

Pros
  • Very quiet; I never would have guessed AT was capable of such silence on the road; not afraid of water; never experienced aquaplaning
Cons
  • Average wheel balancing, between 50 and 70 grams with flat discs

Recently replaced the gt radial savero SUV's tires with a new set of bravo at-771 225/60r17s that I purchased here in the summer. It's unclear why it's classified as year-round while the official website specifically mentions summer. Read some reviews online and decided to buy it. There hasn't been a single unfavorable mention of it on the network in the last five to seven years, which is why I decided to take it myself. There was rain and wind on the day of purchase, thus a yellow or orange…

Pros
  • Price Quality Without fear of stagnation Not frightened by the prospect of deep water while buried Without a doubt, the car is now 2-3 centimeters taller. A tire with a chic white writing pattern. This size is ideal for T31. Less noise is being made by joints Definitely excellent control.
Cons
  • Lack of Maxxis Guarantee Does not use pristine green grass as a riding surface Discomfort on gravel surfaces The car's acceleration and deceleration are sluggish. A twist at the beginning on dry pavement; the bald gt radial gives no indication of this. The rubber creates a squeaky noise when driving backwards. Certainly not just me

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

Prior to that, there were kumho sizes 225/55 R17; nevertheless, I made the decision to switch to new ones that were slightly larger. Maxxis 225/60 R17 had over 2 centimeters of tread depth already. The profile height of 60 is about equivalent to the kumho of 55. As a direct consequence of this, the diameter of the wheel did not much alter, but the width shrunk: ( When going shopping, it is best to bring a ruler and some sort of measuring device with you. In practice, the tread is not nearly as…

Pros
  • Compared to equivalents, these are more affordable, in addition to being quieter. It drives smoothly on water, snow that has been melted, clay that has been wet, and asphalt.
Cons
  • The sizes are more accurate to the next size down.