Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
José A Rodríguez photo
Valencia, Venezuela
4 Level
1087 Review
776 Karma

Review on KanoPool by José A Rodríguez

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Kano is less than a Standard Site to Mine

Kano's providers really believed in the chances of raising when the global crypto-market grew up. But currently, in this decade they are offering a mining pool service very limited, the available window is so simple and does not provide an innovative view as many others. It has little support for assets. Currently, there is not a clear chart of the tokens provided, and they either inform their users of what kind of miners work into the platform.

This mining pool works really different from others because their services are not based on digital networks, but offices from national providers. Since the services are managed in different nations, they count with a little globalized platform. For access to those networks, users must just enter in the link given. Until now they are functioning pretty good, but sometimes they tend to fail. This is possible because the platform does not receive the appropriate management, and they cannot move on updating the external links.

Another tricky thing is that the pool does not show a dashboard to illustrate hash rates like others, it just provides a chart where the name of the pool is saved to identify the usage of the service when entering in external sites.

As you can see, this service is not really beneficial. Mining pools have by general rule features like this one, and just a short selection is very effective. On this time, I cannot offer clear advice whether using it or not, but I think it is not appropriate.




Pros
  • It offers some simple concepts for miners where they can interact with other users and decide how to proceed.
  • It has various external spaces where users can keep in touch with the company. They even offer access to their email.
Cons
  • There are some limits for withdrawals that hasn't been solved. The company does not correct some of the issues when fail logs are registered.
  • The page is very standard. It looks like a platform without capital. The team hasn't improved anything into the service.
  • There is no clear information about the type of tokens that can be mined there.