Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
edc blockchain logo

EDC Blockchain Review




Revainrating 1.5 out of 5  
Crypto Projects

View on AmazonView on ЯM


Global ratings 9
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Type of review

Revainrating 1 out of 5

EDC - tough comeptition

I have bought EDC token as from the first sight it seemed as a good innovation in cryptoindustry with its own blockchain and from my point of view great DPoS consensus. The commercial use case fitted to my expectations. The problem was that in spite of it is own blokchain the use cases were very low. There was intention to use their blockchain for SMEs but the competion is though in this field and dominated by other blockchains (also in quite dissipated area to have innovative idea). The price…

  • own blockchain
  • DPoS
  • low value
  • few users
  • not perspective use case now

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Observe and follow this project from the outside.

Watch and follow this project. In the project, I believe that it has big goals and a team that ensures fast and secure transactions. I expected good ideas from the project and was very much interested in it. But my expectations did not come out as I expected. But according to my tests, I realized that the project has a main plan, so that the token becomes valuable to users. But according to the users of this project, for them it seems to be a negative link and without a reciprocal project. I…

  • I think I will not work on the project yet.
  • No answer.
  • Doubtful.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

It is more useful to follow or observe from the side.

In fact, the plan had gigantic goals, the team of creators made a personal blockchain and aims to provide fast and secure transactions. But even if the gigantic goals and efforts were not in vain, it is impossible to say, in fact, that this has become fully known. I did not take part in the plan from the very beginning, but I never stopped observing it, at the same time I waited for fresh ideas to be presented and interested my concern in a big competition, but I can say that my expectation is…

  • In the meantime, I will not get carried away with this issue.
  • The plan looks rather confusing.
  • Help desk is not responding.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

My opinion about the project EDC Blockchain

Indeed, the task had huge objectives, the designer group made its own blockchain and planned to give quick and secure exchanges what's more. However, regardless of whether enormous objectives and endeavors haven't been to no end, we can't say that this has gotten totally mainstream. I didn't take an interest in the undertaking from the earliest starting point, yet I followed constantly it, simultaneously I anticipated that new ideas should be presented and stood out for me in the huge rivalry…

  • For the time being, I will remain on hang on this matter.
  • the venture looks extremely untidy.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Nees More experience and further turn of events

As per my overall examination and my insight, the task appears to have been viewed as quite a while past, and it has not been well before this is completely introduced to the client. Truth be told, since such undertakings are continually in rivalry on the lookout, it doesn't appear to be feasible to say that they are better. The general objective of the venture was to empower them to trade tokens on their own chain, and they thought about making it more important. Notwithstanding, I think this…

  • recorded on some safe trade
  • the site is extremely blended.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

EDC blockchain has been closed down.

This is one of the greatest cryptocurrency project, that has a good features and the future of the project looks very promising to Users, becouse it provides transaction possibilities and also good way of promoting the investment of people to another level. But the project is lacking many good possibilities and the way it is going I don't think it will get to a Next generation. Bit by bit Manny cryptocurrency project seams to be going down because they failed to make a good decision when…

  • This project has a good vision.
  • Has to be closed down because of poor usage.
  • Poor information regarding this project.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

the level of the project is said to remain the same.

The project actually had a big purpose, the team created its own blockchain, and on top of that it aims to achieve the goal of fast and reliable users. That is, we cannot say that while the great goals and efforts of the creators are not in vain, it is not entirely popular. I didn’t pay attention to the project from the beginning but after a while when I started the project I noticed that the creators didn’t show change, new ideas. When I went to the project's website, I didn't see anything…

  • Nowadays, users are less supportive of the project.
  • I think this project will fix it.
  • the creators of the project should come up with an idea.
  • This project did not attract the attention of the designer.
  • They have to be diligent, at least.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

It is more useful to watch or follow from outside

In fact, the project had big goals, the developer team created its own blockchain and aimed to provide fast and secure transactions on top of that. But even if big goals and efforts haven't been in vain, we can't say that this has become completely popular. I did not participate in the project from the very beginning, but I never stopped following it, at the same time I expected new ideas to be introduced and attracted my attention in the big competition, but I can say that my waiting did not…

  • For now, I will stay on hold on this matter.
  • the project looks very messy.
  • the support team is not responding.
  • the token's value is still too low.
  • no new ideas for users.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Nees More experience and further development

According to my general research and my knowledge, the project seems to have been considered a long time ago, and it has not been long before this is fully presented to the user. In fact, since such projects are constantly in competition in the market, it does not seem possible to say that they are better. The overall goal of the project was to enable them to exchange tokens on their own chain, and they considered making it more valuable. However, I think this goal seems to have failed. The…

  • listed on some secure exchange
  • I can not say anything else
  • the website is very mixed.
  • I could not find the links of social media accounts
  • its value has always remained low
  • There are very few user communities
  • It takes a lot of time to sell the token