Review on Ravencoin Classic by Navruza Saitkulova
I don't think it's an attractive project
When the project was first launched, it managed to have great value. Now it seems that it has not managed to maintain the same popularity. The mode of service of the project claims that it enables the token issuer to have all the features he decides and allow us to skip it as securities or collections, which can be limited in quantity, and then issue them. It also seems to be using the X16R protocol while doing all this.
Currently, the website of the project and all links are open to the user, but it does not seem attractive. So I think the design of the website is not impressive at all. Also, verifiable information about the developer team is not provided. The project has only 696 followers on its Twitter account, and with it, occasional sharing is made, which means it is not actively managed.
Despite these, the RVC token is currently listed on several exchanges and appears to have good liquidity. Moreover, the transaction volume of the token is high enough, but as I said above, although its value is high at first, now the token value seems very low.
In short, the project does not seem to have the popularity it desires, as it has always remained the same, in other words, because it does not provide attractive service.
Pros
- the transaction volume is high enough
- listed on several exchanges
- its liquidity is sufficient
Cons
- I did not like the web site design
- There is occasional sharing on social media accounts
- its value continues to decrease every day
- There is very little user base
