Review on Ravencoin Classic by Jessica Harris
I don't believe it's an appealing undertaking
At the point when the venture was first dispatched, it figured out how to have incredible worth. Presently it appears to be that it has not figured out how to keep up a similar fame. The method of administration of the task asserts that it empowers the symbolic guarantor to have every one of the highlights he chooses and permit us to skip it as protections or assortments, which can be restricted in amount, and afterward issue them. It likewise is by all accounts utilizing the X16R convention while doing this.
Presently, the site of the undertaking and all connections are available to the client, however it doesn't appear to be appealing. So I think the plan of the site isn't great in any way. Additionally, certain data about the designer group isn't given. The venture has just 696 adherents on its Twitter account, and with it, incidental sharing is made, which implies it isn't effectively overseen.
Regardless of these, the RVC token is right now recorded on a few trades and seems to have great liquidity. In addition, the exchange volume of the token is sufficiently high, yet as I said above, in spite of the fact that its worth is high from the outset, presently the symbolic worth appears to be low.
So, the task doesn't appear to have the prominence it wants, as it has consistently continued as before, as such, on the grounds that it doesn't offer appealing assistance.
Pros
- the exchange volume is sufficiently high
- recorded on a few trades
- its liquidity is adequate
Cons
- I didn't care for the web architecture
- There is periodic sharing via online media accounts
- its worth keeps on diminishing each day
- There is next to no client base
