Review on Samsung Galaxy S9 G965F (International Version) by Indal Singh ᠌

Yes, fast, yes super screen, just magic. But the camera is very bad. The camera of this device has a big drawback - a clean soap dish with a software improvement. At first I thought it was only so bad for me, like a marriage, although I bought it in an official store. But it turns out they are all like that. I explain. In the normal mode (without auto-blurring of the background), only always (!) Objects in the distance, in the background, are focused SIGNIFICANTLY better than the objects on which the device itself focused. This is what we immediately noticed on our device! Pure software glitch. Plus, the quality of the matrix does not match the price of the device, this one can be seen in the photos in the dark with a high ISO. It is immediately clear that 99% of supposedly honest reviews of Samsung technology are pure lobbying. And what can I say, go to the store, go to a usually moderately lit place, and take a photo of a person in the "auto" mode, zoom in, take a closer look, and you will understand everything right away - the focus is terrible - objects in the distance are clearer, which means there is no real focus no, but additional processing blurs faces - everything is like a cheap soap dish with software errors. We tested between the old, 6 times cheaper "I won't name the brand", the new "competitor" for 30 thousand and this S9 + - a photo of the same place from the same angle from a tripod, with the same lighting, and everything is fair. You can immediately see how much better the photo from other devices is. And to talk about additional processing of photos on a computer - please do not, this is not a camera, this is a smartphone - "I took a picture and sent it to my friends" its main task. Many smartphone manufacturers make cameras for devices up to 40 thousand at a price - much better!