Everything may be understood by comparison, and I use the benchmark of my old processor, the 4690k. Heaven, as well as the earth. An outstanding six-core came out of it in my opinion. I have high hopes that it will be the same with it as it was with the prior processor, which I installed and then forgot about for five years. To contrast with similar products offered by Intel, I do not have debilitation. Thus, I am not interested in the difference between plus or minus a couple of frames in games, plus or minus a couple of points in the benchmark, plus or minus a couple of thousand for this. I wanted a six-core processor that was both cheap and efficient, and I was able to find one that met all three criteria. There are no equivalents available because of the high cost of the mother board on the B450 chipset. The previous generation is significantly less powerful, and the one that will replace it will undoubtedly be more expensive due to the fact that it has not yet been released. Finally, AMD stopped being ovens, and finally, there was no longer a need to overclock both the processor and the memory. Excellent new architecture and Infinity Fabric. Well, you may somewhat increase the last frequency and decrease the timings, but you won't gain a significant rise from doing either of those things, which is why doing them has become more of an entertainment than a requirement. I attributed the negatives, such as the price, to the pricing, which stemmed from the short life cycle of this processor. Even during the course of the year, the 3600 was able to become obsolete, but its price did not decrease by very much. This is something that AMD has already hinted at with their plans to develop the budget market. Although it only has four cores instead of six, the 3300x on four cores is already nipping at its heels. One can have hope for applications in which the number of cores and threads is decided rather than the efficiency of the core itself, but there are not so many of these applications, and looking back at previous generations, one can see that the same 2600 costs almost half as much as the 3600, and it is significantly inferior to the 3600. In light of this, and in anticipation of the release of the 4xxx line this year, and after it the fifth one in 2022, both of which will support DDR5 memory, we are in a position to say that it is highly likely that the 3600 will be inferior to the new AMD solutions of the next generation and quite strongly so. So it turns out that you pay 14,000 for a very powerful processor, which by the end of the year will cost 11,000, or even less with the release of the 4th generation and will be at the level of their 4 cores.
💪 AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 Black Edition: 6-Core Processor with Unparalleled Performance
134 Review
🚀 Upgrade Your PC with TP-Link Archer T5E WiFi Card - Dual Band Wireless Network Card for Gaming and Streaming on Windows 10, 8.1, 8, 7 (32/64-bit) with Bluetooth 4.2 Support
83 Review
🌬️ Silent Cooling Power: Dark Rock Pro 4 CPU Cooler with 250W TDP, BK022
134 Review
AMD Phenom II X4 940 💻 Black Edition 3.0GHz AM2+ Processor - Retail
96 Review
M.2 Screw Kit: Easy Mounting for NVMe SSDs on ASUS Motherboards
19 Review
uxcell 3.5" HDD Screw Black 200pcs for Computer PC Case - Flat Phillips Head - 6#-32 - Hard Drive Fasteners
10 Review
🔧 Premium Repair Replacement Screws & Tools for MacBook Pro Retina 15"/13" - Complete Bottom Case Set
10 Review
🖥️ Helifouner 450-Piece Computer Standoffs Spacer Screws Kit: Ideal for Hard Drive, Motherboard, Fan, Power Graphics & Computer Cases
10 Review