Review on Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM by Eh Chit ᠌

A decent SHARP working lens for taking straightforward, unfussy photos of a variety of subjects on a daily basis. does not soap, and focuses swiftly and precisely. On 105mm, there is bokeh that appears to be quite good. It falls short (just in my opinion) when compared to 24-70 in the image. If fixes from a hole 2.8 (not L, of course) may be compared to 24-70 in the image (also IMO), then this one still falls short. The focal range for a whole matrix, however, is still in more demand than 24-70. For me, this lens remained merely a kit lens for the 5D. Because of version 4.0, you can't really call it creative, but since it's still an elka, its quality surpasses that of the majority of standard zooms, making it ideal for aspiring REPORTAGE photographers or for usage as your only lens. There are no complaints about the level of performance generally, and the trunk never leaves without permission, as they say here! It's up to everyone to determine if it's worth the money or not. Despite the abundance of options, there is only one choice for him, and that is zooms, in my opinion. Most people forget what they still want while searching for a new lens: to improve the quality of the image or to get a LARGE and EFFICIENT lens to replace a whale or a normal colleague. If it weren't for reporting, I would suggest taking the EF 35 2.0, EF 85 1.8, and EF 100 2.0 and adding 5000r. With the 100th, you can postpone taking 135 2.0 for a little while (if money is tight) and have the perfect portrait for reasonable money! The soul will turn around at this point.