Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Kisiel ᠌ photo
1 Level
357 Review
0 Karma

Review on Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002 by Stanislaw Kisiel ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

His drawing's lack of skill and its "disgusting" bokeh are frequently mentioned as flaws. Dear comrades, artistic photographs can be fixed—preferably the best ones. Regarding the drawing, it is "electronic", lacks artistic merit, and is entirely made of plastic from the L series. "Bokeh" . Yes, probably not, however there is a blur zone that is entirely digestible and does not at all make one feel disgusted (such glasses exist). It is said above where to find artistic bokeh. The idea of backlight is another. I haven't encountered a single issue with CS; just learn how to construct a frame correctly and it will vanish. pertaining to the inappropriate usage of the crop. The very statement is absurd, to be honest. What do you think, ages 18 to 55, will wind down and enjoy life on 60d or 7d? utter ridiculousness. Thus, when combined with the 7-ki's quick focusing, you can take stylish "wiring" in ai servo and obtain beautiful photographs of moving subjects. There were no particular issues when I used efs 15-85 (very high-quality glass), but when I switched to 24-105, the difference was immediately apparent. As for me, it is unclear why some people write about "terrible" flaws (and you must come up with this with your head, not just with a wallet and a red stripe) or compare it to top repairs, depending on whether they are intentionally doing so or not.

Pros
  • 5+ for autofocus speed depiction of colors well done stub
Cons
  • not located