Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Czerwiski แ Œ photo
1 Level
329 Review
0 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ’พ Western Digital Green 2.5-inch 120GB SATA3 Solid State Drive (SSD) WDS120G1G0A by Wiktor Czerwiski แ Œ

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I am very upset, the product is no good.

Let's start with the fact that WD betrayed their "fans" and sold themselves for money. If earlier they made the g1g version on a high-quality and good controller, as well as on Silicon Motion memory chips, which gave out very good performance, now, in the g2g version, that is, the second version, they sold out and began to use the cheapest components that could be . And they learned it so badly that they didnโ€™t even publish the recording speed of this disc on the official website, because itโ€™s completely ridiculous. So, there was a company that produced chips at one time - SanDisk (by the way, they sometimes produced good flash drives), which quickly flew out of the market due to disgusting performance. But WD came to the rescue and bought all these chips, which are now being installed in their trashy brainchild WDS120G2G0A, in connection with which the write speed has dropped as much as 5 times (in comparison with the first brother), the read speed is kept at the level only when the disk is empty, it costs fill it up a little and it will immediately begin to bend. About the rest of the indicators, I generally keep quiet. And the service life has decreased by as much as 750,000 hours, which is a lot. That is, it became 1,000,000, instead of 1,750,000, that is, the resource of work has almost halved. I'll tell you this, take any other SSD for the same money, but not this one! For example, AMD has good Radeon SSDs, which are at least better in speed and are made on SILICON Motion chips, not SanDisk. Skati, is lying when it says that this SSD is made on Silicon Motion chips. I doubt that this is information from the office. site, but it is possible that WD is lying even at home.

Pros
  • None.
Cons
  • Their mass. All below: