Review on Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM by Trn Ngc Qu (Edwards ᠌

It is common for people to criticize the "disgusting" bokeh and the lack of creativity in his drawings as flaws in his work. There are solutions available, brothers and sisters, for creative photography (preferably top ones). In regards to the artwork, it is "electronic," meaning that it does not contain any form of art, and the quality and material from the L series are completely. "Bokeh" . Yes, probably not, but there is a gray area that can be digested without any problems and does not incite any feelings of repugnance (there are such glasses). The answer to the question of where to go to get artful bokeh is up above. Backlight is another assertion that has been made. Once I figured out how to appropriately build a frame, the issue went away completely; other than that, I haven't had any issues with CS. In regard to the inappropriate usage of the crop. To tell you the truth, the very statement is absurd. Do you think that people aged 18 to 55 should wind down and enjoy life on 60d or 7d? The definition of ludicrous. So, when combined with the 7-ki's fast focusing, you can achieve beautiful photographs of moving subjects with elegant "wire" in AI servo. When I switched to a 24-105, I saw a significant improvement in image quality, despite the fact that I had been using an efs 15-85, which has quite high-quality glass. As for me, those who have either not grown up to L yet write about "terrible" shortcomings (and this is exactly what you need to come up with with your head, and not just with a wallet and a red stripe), or comrades who voluntarily or involuntarily compare it with top fixes, it is not clear why they do so. I say this because those who write about "terrible" shortcomings are either those who have not yet grown up to L or those who have not yet grown up to L