Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Michael Baek ᠌ photo
Seoul
1 Level
109 Review
157 Karma

Review on Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L ll USM Zoom Lens: Optimized Performance for Canon EF Cameras by Michael Baek ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Mediocre goods, most likely I will not use.

Clearly overrated. For interiors, it’s better to take the same wide zoom only with F4, anyway, not a single normal pro shoots interiors with their hands, that one is sharper across the frame and high F values ​​\u200b\u200bare much clearer than this glass. The advantages of glass are evening architecture and creative portraits, because you can control distortion and that's it. Rating 4 lens. And put three because of the price. Its 80,000 is not worth it at all. The red price for him is 25 on the secondary market. At work, no one likes this glass.

Pros
  • Light, bright, very comfortable focal length when shooting both outdoors and indoors.
Cons
  • Completely unsharp at the edges from 2.8 to 9-10. You can downvote as much as you want, but those who write about it are right. More or less uniform sharpness only at 11-14F, which is not always enough for interiors, and even then the edges are also soft.

Comments (2)

Please, sign in to write a comment
November 16, 2022
For the money, the sharpness should have been better.
October 26, 2022
For the money, the sharpness should have been better.