
Garbage 1) It is very thin .4) Plastic will scratch if touched wrongly. 5) Fastening clips break if touched incorrectly. 6) The hole in the front panel is only suitable for 173mm radios. Good luck financing your 173mm radio. Almost all dual dins have a large aperture. The fact is that the cage really does fit in the hole. The interchangeable ventilation ducts really match the cage. So there's no logical reason why they couldn't design the front panel to fit the more common double din sizes. Zero. In theory it can be modified with extremely generous use of the Dremel. Due to the construction, however, this is not recommended. I ended up breaking mine and need to make my own faceplate. If it was $20 (about the cost) then I wouldn't have been so upset. But the manufacturer has the gall to charge $175 for this junk. then I wouldn't be so upset. But the manufacturer has the gall to charge $175 for this junk. then I wouldn't be so upset. But the manufacturer has the gall to charge $175 for this junk.

βοΈ Enhance Your Aviation Experience with the David Clark H10-13.4 Aviation Headset
9 Review

π§ FARO Aviation Headset Converter: Low to High Impedance Adapter for General Aviation (GA) and Military Headsets
9 Review

βοΈ Enhancing Aviation Safety: ASA-OVC View Limiting Device for Clearer Vision in Overcast Conditions
9 Review

π©οΈ Stratux ADS-B Dual Band Receiver: Advanced Aviation Weather and Traffic System with WAAS GPS, AHRS, Battery Pack, Suction Mount, Antennas, SDR
9 Review