Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens, black by Arun Kumar ᠌

-followed by whale supreme. You will, of course, have to acclimate yourself to the reality that the focal length is always the same. - When you have optics of this caliber, you would instinctively want to photograph flowers, leaves, and insects; yet, who would be interested in purchasing a macro lens? You will not be able to go very near to the subject that is being shot due to the focusing distance. I assure you that I will upload a picture for your longer-term use. Has some pros 1. Aperture 2. I desired a width of 28 millimeters and 1.8, but the cost determined everything else. This one was a tad bit more affordable. However, considering that the price was identical to that of an 85 mm f/1.8 lens, I came to the conclusion that the 85 mm lens is still best suited for portraiture; however, despite this, the ability to shoot a person up to the waist, or even to his full height, is not possible at home; rather, this can be done only in natural settings (where there is the possibility to move at least 5 meters). I have high hopes that folks who are having trouble deciding which fixed lens to buy will find my review helpful. I will refrain from praising it because I have been utilizing it rather frequently as of late. Yet what I found to be in a positive light, I wrote down. 3. After the whale 18-200mm, there is a discernible improvement in clarity. 4. The bokeh is very pretty. (chamber 50D). I was terrified of either back focus or front focus, both of which are discussed by everyone on this forum. On the other hand, it looks like everything is in order. did not notice deviations These are some downsides: 1. My opinion is that the absence of a lens hood and filter is not a significant drawback for this camera. They do not give you a case for your cell phone as a free gift if you spend $1500 with them. Yet, what exactly do you want? 2. Due to the fact that the attention is on the environment, it is impossible to use a polarizing filter. If this is something that someone values, you should pay attention to it! 3. Because I only occasionally noticed them when zooming in, chromatic aberrations didn't convince me that they existed. As I shot a flower that was blooming on my window in backlight, bright daylight, using an aperture of 1.4, I observed that the chromaticity of the flower was a really vibrant shade of purple. It is obvious that it will become less noticeable when the aperture is reduced, but it will still be present. 3. What is written on this page regarding buzzing and everything else, well, yes, there is a tiny bit of truth to it. But I'm not one to pass judgment. 4. Absolutely, and the D.O.F. naturally (not convenient for group shooting). First things first, cover the aperture as much as you can. and the best way to get there. Make sure everything is legible by turning on the flash. Sorry for the interruption, but I'll give you an example: I recently purchased a cell phone. Prior to making my purchase, I read on the internet that everything about the phone is terrible: the case is terrible, the sensor is difficult to read in direct sunlight, and so on. Okay, so there is a tiny bit, but it's not something that's particularly important to me. My theory is that those who have used L optics themselves are more likely to write evaluations that are really negative. There is no such thing as a perfect product; manufacturers are not so naive as to think they can create one. Because no one could tell me anything, I use straightforward language and illustrate it with examples. I tell my impressions