Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Siwak ᠌ photo
1 Level
312 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 6D Body camera, black by Stanislaw Siwak ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

In my opinion, Wi-Fi and GPS are unnecessary. If I could get by without these features, the price tag would be much more reasonable. I tried Fi-Wi and while it's interesting, it's not something I need, and it drains my battery really quickly. In most cases, this f/a model is an excellent career choice. Protection from dust and moisture, reserved for the finest models; additional funding is available. This f/a comes with my highest endorsement. When shooting in RAW, the switch from crop mode does need upgrading to larger and faster memory cards. Though reasonable, you'd rather avoid spending more. If not, it will bog down while writing data from the buffer to the card and may even cease firing altogether.

Pros
  • Full frame, which means less noise compared to crop, a greater sensitivity, a broader dynamic range, accurate focusing (I work only on the center point), and the capacity to photograph in very tough settings with low light. A powerful computer with a quick algorithm for handling image processing. The lowest levels of noise and most accurate color reproduction of the 10D, 30D, 40D, 50D, and 70D I tested. in addition to increased commotion and higher hard disk charges (I maintain a sizable archive). As I mostly now photograph with flash, I no longer require rapid fire. The main benefit of this f/a is a high-quality picture; upgrading from a Canon 50D will result in a noticeable improvement. Tough as nails battery. I think it should be manageable given the limited number of focal points; again, I just deal with the central one. I currently own a 6D, 70D, and 5D Mark III, and I can say that the image quality is not worse than that of the third brand. A great f/a to have if you're not concerned about your professional status. Having a shutter with a very slow response time is beneficial since it reduces camera shake. The difference between 1/180 and 1/200 on brand 3 is purely arbitrary; the image is formed at the moment the flash is fired, and the speed at which it operates is much faster; and the difference is neither large nor fundamental; it is, rather, a marketing ploy designed to limit the camera's potential in comparison to the 3 mark.
Cons
  • Shutter only lasted 97 thousand frames before breaking. When using a flash, the metering is poorer than on brand 3, the inaccuracy is greater, and it is less convenient to make corrections than on the 50D or 5D Mark III. Although I find its portability and compact size to be a drawback, others may find these to be advantages.

Similar reviews