Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Janis Liekmanis ᠌ photo
1 Level
334 Review
0 Karma

Review on Logitech Backlit Mechanical Keyboard Passthrough by Janis Liekmanis ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not satisfactory, upset with the product.

I own two of these in total. Both are being ignored at the moment. The first one I tried, I kept using it for nearly a year; at first, I had a lot of positive feelings about it, but eventually, I started having issues with it. After it, there was a space for a double click, and then all of the other keys. A little over a year later, it made an appearance. After a couple of weeks, the W button became detached, and the legs of the fastener just snapped off. Laughed, then went and bought the exact same thing. Her appearance appealed to me very much. After putting it to use for a period of eight months, I saw that the identical issues with the repetition of spacebars emerged. I did not wait until the keys started falling off before I went out and purchased a keyboard made by a different manufacturer. By the way, it seemed to me (and facts like "it seemed to me") that my new membrane (I won't identify the manufacturer because I don't want this to be regarded a commercial) has a response time that is twice as good. To summarize, a keyboard for $6,000 for an entire year? Not interested.

Pros
  • hefty metal container, stunning in appearance Full numpad Excellent backlighting (if it's configured properly). No extra keys A USB hub that is powered by two USB ports but does not impact the voltage. Mechanics at an affordable price from a (what I believed to be) high-quality manufacturer
Cons
  • (in a subjective sense) crooked soft logtech Bad keycaps. Following a year of consistent use, the W button broke off completely. Again, double and triple clicks didn't start happening until after a year of use. Lack of protection against floods. Instead, it is there, but not in the place where it ought to be. Under the gap, which is the most vulnerable location, there is a massive hole, and the reason why it was done is not quite evident (or, rather, understandable). In accordance with the appropriate shift, the same, but smaller. The fact that they are there, despite the fact that the rest of the building is entirely sealed off, raises more questions than it answers.