I tried out three different lenses while I was in the shop. One of them had a front focus, and the other two ended up being really good overall. A very good lens for the price of 16,000, which is the price of the version without image stabilization. For 22022 rub. Since the absence of a stub is not at all important at focal lengths ranging from 17-50 millimeters, I do not believe that it is reasonable to purchase a version that includes an image stabilizer. It sounds more like a tactic that Tamron would use for marketing. You could purchase a Tokina AT-X 165 f/2.8 Pro DX for the same amount of money. It is optically no better than the Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8, and in certain places it is even less crisp when the aperture is wide open, but it has a pleasing "plastic" picture and a superb branded metal construction, which makes it liquid in the secondary market. Unlike Tamron, which, after a couple of years of operation, can only be sold for a penny when it's put up for sale. In a nutshell, it was not an honor for me to purchase this lens.
New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction 📷 Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs
104 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
📷 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review