I've used several other Ubiquiti wireless hotspot models and expected more from this one, and even more for the price. It was about 2x more expensive than the Lites I currently use. I've been using FlexHD for a while. It should have better coverage than the Lite, but it doesn't. It uses the same channel and position as the Lite it replaced and reports a lot of interference. I get no response from Ubiquiti. According to support forum members, it looks like Nano is having the same issue. And so far no firmware update has included a fix for this from Ubiquiti. While Ubiquiti says the Felx HD should have better coverage than the UFO-style Lite, I don't think so. Is it because it's actually reporting a real problem, is it causing more interference for some reason? inside but my cover is just as good, and it fits better in the position where I oddly had to hang the Lite UFO. so it stays.
Wi-Fi router Keenetic Hero 4G KN-2310, white
76 Review
MikroTik RBcAPGi-5acD2nD-US: High-performance Dual-Band 802.11ac Access Point
35 Review
Wi-Fi signal amplifier (repeater) TP-LINK TL-WA860RE, white
21 Review
MikroTik RB941-2nD RouterBoard hAP Lite: Affordable 2.4GHz Home Access Point
71 Review
🌐 StarTech.com NETRS2321P: 1-Port RS232 to Ethernet IP Converter, Serial over IP Device Server - Black
5 Review
🔌 StarTech.com NETRS232 Serial to IP Ethernet Device Server - DIN Rail Mountable - Serial Device Server - Serial Over IP Device Server (Black)
4 Review
🔌 USR-TCP232-410s: RS232/RS485 Serial to Ethernet Adapter/IP Device Server with DHCP/DNS Support
4 Review
🔌 uni USB C Hub with Ethernet Adapter, 4K HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, and 3 USB 3.0 Ports for MacBook Pro, iPad Pro, XPS
11 Review