I've used several other Ubiquiti wireless hotspot models and expected more from this one, and even more for the price. It was about 2x more expensive than the Lites I currently use. I've been using FlexHD for a while. It should have better coverage than the Lite, but it doesn't. It uses the same channel and position as the Lite it replaced and reports a lot of interference. I get no response from Ubiquiti. According to support forum members, it looks like Nano is having the same issue. And so far no firmware update has included a fix for this from Ubiquiti. While Ubiquiti says the Felx HD should have better coverage than the UFO-style Lite, I don't think so. Is it because it's actually reporting a real problem, is it causing more interference for some reason? inside but my cover is just as good, and it fits better in the position where I oddly had to hang the Lite UFO. so it stays.
MikroTik Dual-Concurrent Access Point: hAP ac Lite RB952Ui-5ac2nD-US
79 Review
📶 High-Performance MikroTik hAP Mini RB931-2nD: Small 2GHz Wireless Access Point, 3x 10/100 Ethernet Ports, 650MHz CPU & RouterOS
24 Review
Wi-Fi router Keenetic Hero 4G KN-2310, white
76 Review
MikroTik RB941-2nD RouterBoard hAP Lite: Affordable 2.4GHz Home Access Point
71 Review
🔌 USR-TCP232-410s: RS232/RS485 Serial to Ethernet Adapter/IP Device Server with DHCP/DNS Support
4 Review
🔌 CERRXIAN RS232 to Ethernet Serial Device Server - TCP/IP Converter with 1Port DB9 RS232 Serial to Ethernet Connectivity
3 Review
UGREEN USB 3.0 Ethernet Adapter Hub with RJ45: Fast Gigabit Ethernet Converter, 3 Ports USB 3.0 Hub Compatible for MacBook, iMac, Surface Pro, Chromebook, Laptop, PC
11 Review
🌐 StarTech.com NETRS2321P: 1-Port RS232 to Ethernet IP Converter, Serial over IP Device Server - Black
5 Review