I have used this lens for 6-7 years. Overall, it's sharper than the 18-55, comfortable to use, and has good stub. Of the shortcomings - at the ends of the focal ranges - soap, it is better to use medium focal lengths - 22-70mm, like aperture from 5.6 for sharpness. Good entry level lens. But if I were buying now, I wouldnโt take it, itโs better to have Sigma 17-50 2.8 or Sigma 18-250 3.5-6.3 macro, or 16-85 Nikkor for kranjak. Structurally, 18-105 is light and flimsy with a poastic mount. Would I buy it now? No, it's not worth the money they're asking for a new one. You can take it only if it is in a kit and at a good offer, it is better not to buy separately.
๐ท Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens - Compatible with Canon DSLR Cameras (Lens Only)
73 Review
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Fixed Lens - Discontinued by Manufacturer
93 Review